Kreder H J, Wright J G, McLeod R
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada.
Surgery. 1997 Feb;121(2):223-5. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90294-4.
Providers, payers, buyers, and the public at large will continue to demand information regarding the quality of health care service. High quality clinical and functional data on the entire population would not only allow a better understanding of health outcomes after medical or surgical interventions but would also provide information regarding disease burden, the population at risk, and indications for treatment. We currently are dealing with two separate pieces of the puzzle. On the one hand, randomized clinical trials and observational studies continue to provide high quality information regarding small samples of the population. On the other hand, the analysis of large administrative data sets provides a broad overview of health care services and patient outcomes at the population level. To provide meaningful data regarding the quality of health care, we must go beyond morbidity and mortality rates and attempt to measure patient function at the population level.
医疗服务提供者、支付方、购买方以及广大公众将继续要求获取有关医疗保健服务质量的信息。关于全体人群的高质量临床和功能数据不仅能让人们更好地了解医疗或手术干预后的健康结果,还能提供有关疾病负担、高危人群以及治疗指征的信息。我们目前正在处理这个难题的两个独立部分。一方面,随机临床试验和观察性研究继续为一小部分人群提供高质量信息。另一方面,对大型行政数据集的分析提供了人群层面医疗保健服务和患者结果的广泛概述。为了提供有关医疗保健质量的有意义数据,我们必须超越发病率和死亡率,尝试在人群层面衡量患者功能。