Albertsen P C, Aaronson N K, Muller M J, Keller S D, Ware J E
Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3955, USA.
Urology. 1997 Feb;49(2):207-16; discussion 216-7. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00485-2.
To assess and compare the quality of life of men with advanced prostate cancer who are in remission receiving treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and flutamide or who are in progression.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey to measure health-related quality of life in a cohort of 113 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 60 in remission and 53 with disease progression, using a battery of questionnaires, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey SF-36, and a prostate cancer-specific module.
Patients in remission receiving an LHRH agonist and flutamide reported a significantly better quality of life compared with patients with disease progression (P < 0.011). Men with hormone-sensitive cancer had significantly less bodily pain, more vitality, more social interactions, and better mental health than patients with hormone-resistant disease. No differences were noted between the two groups concerning treatment-related problems such as diarrhea, constipation, urinary symptoms, sexual function, sexual satisfaction or hot flashes, although men in remission tended to rate each of these items more favorably than did men with disease progression. Men in remission have a health-related quality of life that is similar to an equivalent norm for men in the United States general population as compared with men with disease progression, who demonstrate significant compromise in all domains measured.
Patients in remission receiving an LHRH agonist and flutamide have a quality of life that is indistinguishable from a matched male population without prostate cancer and a quality of life significantly better than that of men with androgen-resistant disease. Among patients who respond to total androgen ablation, flutamide and an LHRH agonist provide significant, measurable benefits to recipients independent of any possible improvement in longevity.
评估并比较接受促黄体生成素释放激素(LHRH)激动剂和氟他胺治疗且病情缓解的晚期前列腺癌男性患者与病情进展患者的生活质量。
我们进行了一项横断面调查,使用一系列问卷,包括欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30、医学结局研究简明健康调查SF-36以及一个前列腺癌特异性模块,来测量113例转移性前列腺癌患者队列的健康相关生活质量,其中60例病情缓解,53例病情进展。
与病情进展的患者相比,接受LHRH激动剂和氟他胺治疗且病情缓解的患者报告的生活质量显著更好(P < 0.011)。激素敏感型癌症男性患者的身体疼痛明显更少,活力更强,社交互动更多,心理健康状况也比激素抵抗型疾病患者更好。两组在腹泻、便秘、泌尿症状、性功能、性满意度或潮热等与治疗相关的问题上未发现差异,尽管病情缓解的男性对这些项目的评分往往比病情进展的男性更有利。与病情进展的男性相比,病情缓解的男性的健康相关生活质量与美国普通人群中男性的相应标准相似,病情进展的男性在所有测量领域均有显著受损。
接受LHRH激动剂和氟他胺治疗且病情缓解的患者的生活质量与无前列腺癌的匹配男性人群无异,且生活质量显著优于雄激素抵抗型疾病男性患者。在对全雄激素阻断有反应的患者中,氟他胺和LHRH激动剂为接受者提供了显著的、可测量的益处,与寿命的任何可能改善无关。