Cordero J, Munuera L, Folgueira M D
Hospital La Paz, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 3:SC34-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89030-9.
The influence of the localization and size of orthopaedic implants on infection has been analyzed extensively, but the influence of implant shape and chemical composition has rarely been studied, and the influence of the surface has only been described in one single report. Several experimental studies have tried to compare the incidence of infection for different materials. PMMA usually appears as the implant material most prone to causing infection, while titanium (Ti) and cobalt-chromium (CoCr) are the materials most resistant to infection. On the polished surface of cylinders implanted in rabbit femora, it took 40 times more inoculum to produce a clinical infection than it took for porous CoCr implants. The polished surface implants required 2.5 times more inoculum than porous Ti to produce infection.
骨科植入物的位置和大小对感染的影响已得到广泛分析,但植入物形状和化学成分的影响鲜有研究,而其表面的影响仅在一份报告中有所描述。多项实验研究试图比较不同材料的感染发生率。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)通常表现为最易引发感染的植入材料,而钛(Ti)和钴铬合金(CoCr)则是最具抗感染能力的材料。在植入兔股骨的圆柱体抛光表面上,产生临床感染所需的接种物量是多孔CoCr植入物的40倍。抛光表面植入物产生感染所需的接种物量是多孔Ti的2.5倍。