Quinn S F, Sheley R C, Szumowski J, Shimakawa A
Department of Radiology, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, OR 97210, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Jan-Feb;7(1):197-203. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070130.
We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight (3DTOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with two-dimensional time of flight (2DTOF) MRA with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo (C-MON) and conventional angiography (CA) when it was available. C-MON re-orders the normal data acquisition to minimize ghosting artifacts generated by pulsatile flow. The initial phase of the study involved optimization of parameters and comparison C-MON with no C = MON in eight patients and volunteers. The final phase of the study involved 53 patients who were imaged with contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON. Thirty of these patients also had CA. In the initial phase, 2DTOF MRA with C-MON was found to be equal (n = 3) or superior (n = 5) to 2DTOF without C-MON. In the final phase, the agreement among all imaging modalities varied from substantial to almost perfect (Cohen's kappa = .6-.83). The lowest agreement was using 2DTOF to evaluate the external iliac segments. The among suggested treatments varied from substantial to almost perfect for all imaging modalities (Cohen's kappa = .73-93). The diagnostic efficacies of 2DTOF with C-MON and contrast-enhanced 3DTOF were high overall, with the lowest value being a specificity of 63% for one reader in the evaluation of an external iliac segment using 2DTOF. In summary, 2DTOF with C-MON helped to eliminate artifacts due to pulsatility in the iliac arterial segments. In our experience, both dynamic contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON performed well in the evaluation of the iliac arteries. Both studies have high interobeserver agreement and high diagnostic efficacy. Contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA should be reserved for situations in which the iliac vessels are extremely tortuous or occluded or the external iliac segments are poorly seen.
我们将动态对比增强三维时间飞跃(3DTOF)磁共振血管造影(MRA)与二维时间飞跃(2DTOF)MRA(采用心脏补偿快速梯度回波序列(C-MON))以及在可行时与传统血管造影(CA)进行了比较。C-MON对正常数据采集顺序进行重新排序,以尽量减少由搏动血流产生的鬼影伪影。研究的初始阶段涉及参数优化,并在8名患者和志愿者中比较了有C-MON和无C-MON的2DTOF。研究的最后阶段纳入了53例患者,这些患者接受了对比增强3DTOF MRA和采用C-MON的2DTOF MRA检查。其中30例患者还接受了CA检查。在初始阶段,发现采用C-MON的2DTOF MRA与未采用C-MON的2DTOF相当(n = 3)或更优(n = 5)。在最后阶段,所有成像方式之间的一致性从中度到几乎完美不等(Cohen's kappa系数= 0.6 - 0.83)。一致性最低的是使用2DTOF评估髂外段。对于所有成像方式,建议治疗方案之间的一致性从中度到几乎完美不等(Cohen's kappa系数= 0.73 - 0.93)。总体而言,采用C-MON的2DTOF和对比增强3DTOF的诊断效能较高,其中最低值是一名读者在使用2DTOF评估髂外段时的特异性为63%。总之,采用C-MON的2DTOF有助于消除髂动脉段搏动引起的伪影。根据我们的经验,动态对比增强3DTOF MRA和采用C-MON的2DTOF MRA在评估髂动脉方面均表现良好。两项研究均具有较高的观察者间一致性和较高的诊断效能。对比增强3DTOF MRA应保留用于髂血管极度迂曲或闭塞或髂外段显示不佳的情况。