Mancia G, Sega R, Milesi C, Cesana G, Zanchetti A
Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Ospedale S Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Lancet. 1997 Feb 15;349(9050):454-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07099-7.
In large-scale surveys of individuals with hypertension those whose clinic blood pressure is reduced to 140/90 mm Hg or less have been found to represent only a small fraction of the hypertensive population. We assessed whether these results arise because of a white-coat effect elevating clinic blood pressure.
We randomly selected 2400 individuals from the town of Monza, Italy, and invited them to take part in our study. We measured clinic blood pressure as well as home (morning and evening measurements), and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure-ie, blood pressures largely devoid of a white-coat effect. Based on clinic blood pressure participants were then classified as normotensive, untreated hypertensive (clinic blood pressure > 140 mm Hg systolic and/or > 90 mm Hg diastolic), or treated hypertensive (having antihypertensive treatment). The mean blood pressures for each group were calculated.
1651 people took part in the study. The clinic blood pressure of treated hypertensives (n = 207; 146.9 [SD 18] mm Hg/90.2 [8.6] mm Hg) was only slightly less than in untreated hypertensives (n = 402; 148 [15.2] mm Hg/93.3 [8] mm Hg) and in both groups the blood pressure values were much greater than those of normotensive individuals (n = 1042; 119.5 [10.3] mm Hg/78.1 [6.6] mm Hg) p < 0.001. Averaged home and 24 h blood pressures were lower than clinic blood pressures but similarly higher in untreated and treated hypertensive individuals when compared with normotensive individuals. This was also the case for day and night average blood pressures. The number of treated hypertensive patients found to have blood pressures within the normal limits was small not only when based on clinic blood pressure values but also when based on ambulatory blood-pressure values.
In the hypertensive population the number of patients with inadequate blood-pressure control is high not only when assessed in the clinic but also when assessed by ambulatory-blood-pressure monitoring or at home. The high blood-pressure values commonly found in treated hypertensive individuals cannot be accounted for by a white-coat effect but by a true lack of daily-life blood-pressure control.
在对高血压患者进行的大规模调查中,发现临床血压降至140/90 mmHg或更低的患者仅占高血压人群的一小部分。我们评估了这些结果是否是由于白大衣效应导致临床血压升高所致。
我们从意大利蒙扎镇随机抽取2400人,并邀请他们参与我们的研究。我们测量了临床血压以及家庭血压(早晨和晚上测量),以及24小时动态血压,即基本不存在白大衣效应的血压。然后根据临床血压将参与者分为血压正常者、未经治疗的高血压患者(临床血压收缩压>140 mmHg和/或舒张压>90 mmHg)或接受治疗的高血压患者(正在接受抗高血压治疗)。计算每组的平均血压。
1651人参与了该研究。接受治疗的高血压患者(n = 207;146.9[标准差18]mmHg/90.2[8.6]mmHg)的临床血压仅略低于未经治疗的高血压患者(n = 402;148[15.2]mmHg/93.3[8]mmHg),且两组的血压值均远高于血压正常者(n = 1042;119.5[10.3]mmHg/78.1[6.6]mmHg),p<0.001。家庭血压和24小时血压的平均值低于临床血压,但与血压正常者相比,未经治疗和接受治疗的高血压患者的血压同样较高。白天和夜间的平均血压也是如此。发现血压在正常范围内的接受治疗的高血压患者数量不仅基于临床血压值时较少,基于动态血压值时也较少。
在高血压人群中,血压控制不佳的患者数量不仅在临床评估时很高,在通过动态血压监测或在家中评估时也很高。接受治疗的高血压患者中常见的高血压值不能用白大衣效应来解释,而是由于日常生活中的血压控制真正不足。