Henricsson M, Nilsson A, Janzon L, Groop L
Department of Opthalmology, Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden.
Diabet Med. 1997 Feb;14(2):123-31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199702)14:2<123::AID-DIA306>3.0.CO;2-U.
To study the progression of diabetic retinography in relation to diabetes treatment and glycaemic control in patients with non-insulin dependent (Type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we performed a prospective study in a cohort of 1378 diabetic patients, aged > or = 40 years at diagnosis, of whom 333 were treated with insulin, and 1045 with oral antihyperglycaemic agents or diet alone. In the latter group 174 patients changed to insulin therapy during follow-up. We used the Wisconsin scale to grade retinopathy, recorded blindness (visual acuity < or = 0.1) and visual impairment (visual acuity 0.2-0.4), and measured the average HbA1c for each patient during a mean 3.1 year study period. In a multivariate analysis, patients who changed treatment from oral agents or diet alone to insulin therapy had a relative risk of 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.7-2.3) for progression of retinopathy > or = 3 levels compared with all other patients in the study. The increase in risk remained even after controlling for mean HbA1c (relative risk 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.3-1.9). Progression > or = 3 levels was significantly associated with a higher incidence of macular oedema and deterioration of visual acuity (p < 0.001). The relative risk for blindness/visual impairment due to retinopathy was 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.8-4.0) in the group with changed treatment compared with all the other patients in the study. Poor glycaemic control (Hba1c%) before the start of insulin therapy and any retinopathy at baseline were significant risk factors for progression in the group with changed treatment (both p < 0.01). In the whole study group, poor glycaemic control was significantly associated with retinopathy progression > or = 3 levels; the relative risk for those having mean HbA1c above the median being 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.4-2.1), compared to those with a HbA1c value below the median. Moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline was also associated with progression (relative risk 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.5). In contrast, insulin treatment at baseline was not associated with an increased risk of retinopathy progression. In conclusion, while hyperglycaemia was a risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in all patients, change of treatment from oral drugs to insulin was associated with a 100% increased risk of retinopathy progression and a 3-fold increased risk of blindness/visual impairment.
为研究非胰岛素依赖型(2型)糖尿病(NIDDM)患者糖尿病视网膜病变的进展与糖尿病治疗及血糖控制的关系,我们对1378例确诊时年龄≥40岁的糖尿病患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中333例接受胰岛素治疗,1045例仅接受口服降糖药治疗或饮食控制。在后一组中,174例患者在随访期间改为胰岛素治疗。我们使用威斯康星分级量表对视网膜病变进行分级,记录失明(视力≤0.1)和视力损害(视力0.2 - 0.4),并在平均3.1年的研究期间测量每位患者的平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。在多变量分析中,与研究中的所有其他患者相比,从口服药物或仅饮食治疗改为胰岛素治疗的患者,视网膜病变进展≥3级的相对风险为2.0(95%置信区间1.7 - 2.3)。即使在控制了平均HbA1c之后,风险增加仍然存在(相对风险1.6;95%置信区间1.3 - 1.9)。进展≥3级与黄斑水肿发生率较高和视力恶化显著相关(p < 0.001)。与研究中的所有其他患者相比,治疗改变组因视网膜病变导致失明/视力损害的相对风险为2.7(95%置信区间1.8 - 4.0)。胰岛素治疗开始前血糖控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白百分比)和基线时存在任何视网膜病变是治疗改变组进展的显著危险因素(均p < 0.01)。在整个研究组中,血糖控制不佳与视网膜病变进展≥3级显著相关;平均HbA1c高于中位数的患者相对风险为1.7(95%置信区间1.4 - 2.1),而HbA1c值低于中位数的患者相比。基线时中度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变也与进展相关(相对风险2.5;95%置信区间1.4 - 4.5)。相比之下,基线时的胰岛素治疗与视网膜病变进展风险增加无关。总之,虽然高血糖是所有患者视网膜病变进展的危险因素,但从口服药物改为胰岛素治疗与视网膜病变进展风险增加100%以及失明/视力损害风险增加3倍相关。