• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1978 - 1995年家庭医学学术研究概况:全国性报告分析

A profile of family medicine scholarship 1978-1995: an analysis of national presentations.

作者信息

Holloway R L, Meurer L N

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 1997 Feb;29(2):124-31.

PMID:9048174
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Presentations at the annual meetings of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine were analyzed to determine trends in the content of the work and the types of work represented.

METHODS

All program presentations from 1979, 1986, and 1993-1995 were analyzed. Content classifications were based on historic analyses of family medicine literature. Classifications of types of scholarship came from a 1990 Carnegie Foundation report, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.

RESULTS

Results showed that a wide variety of scholarly activities were presented, but application of educational work was predominant. Many presentations crossed interdisciplinary boundaries, including behavioral science, faculty development, and health services.

CONCLUSIONS

Contributions of family medicine scholarship may be applicable to other medical fields. The variety of family medicine scholarship may warrant a redefinition of reward systems for faculty.

摘要

背景与目的

对家庭医学教师协会年会上的发言进行分析,以确定工作内容的趋势以及所代表的工作类型。

方法

分析了1979年、1986年以及1993 - 1995年的所有会议发言。内容分类基于对家庭医学文献的历史分析。学术类型分类来自1990年卡内基基金会的报告《重新审视学术:教授的优先事项》。

结果

结果表明展示了各种各样的学术活动,但教育工作的应用占主导地位。许多发言跨越了跨学科界限,包括行为科学、教师发展和卫生服务。

结论

家庭医学学术的贡献可能适用于其他医学领域。家庭医学学术的多样性可能需要重新定义教师的奖励制度。

相似文献

1
A profile of family medicine scholarship 1978-1995: an analysis of national presentations.1978 - 1995年家庭医学学术研究概况:全国性报告分析
Fam Med. 1997 Feb;29(2):124-31.
2
The courage of our convictions: family medicine at the cutting edge of scholarship.我们信念的勇气:处于学术前沿的家庭医学。
Fam Med. 1995 Jan;27(1):49-52.
3
Fifteen years of aligning faculty development with primary care clinician-educator roles and academic advancement at the Medical College of Wisconsin.威斯康星医学院将教师发展与基层医疗临床医生教育工作者角色及学术进步相结合的十五年历程。
Acad Med. 2006 Nov;81(11):945-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000242585.59705.da.
4
Translating family medicine's educational expertise into academic success.将家庭医学的教育专长转化为学术成就。
Fam Med. 1995 May;27(5):306-9.
5
Research funding and mentoring in family medicine residencies.家庭医学住院医师培训中的研究资金与指导
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):410-8.
6
Clinical teaching improvement: past and future for faculty development.临床教学改进:教师发展的过去与未来
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):252-7.
7
Title VII innovations in American medical and dental education: responding to 21st century priorities for the health of the American public.《第七章》美国医学与牙科教育的创新:回应21世纪美国公众健康优先事项
Acad Med. 2008 Nov;83(11):1015-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181892966.
8
Support and rewards for scholarly activity in family medicine: a national survey.家庭医学学术活动的支持与奖励:一项全国性调查。
Fam Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;29(7):508-12.
9
A fellowship in rural family medicine: program development and outcomes.农村家庭医学奖学金:项目开发与成果
Fam Med. 1997 Jun;29(6):414-20.
10
Community-engaged scholarship: is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise?社区参与式学术研究:教师在社区开展的工作是一项真正的学术事业吗?
Acad Med. 2005 Apr;80(4):317-21. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200504000-00002.