Severe hypersensitivity reaction during hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis-associated hypersensitivity reactions are well documented in the literature. Ethylene oxide sensitization and activation of complement are important factors involved during such reactions. The majority of severe hypersensitivity reactions in dialysis patients, however, is due to sensitization to ethylene oxide.

METHODS

We report a patient admitted to the hospital with worsening of his renal function. He subsequently required three hemodialysis treatments, all of which resulted in severe hypersensitivity reactions requiring endotracheal intubation. The initial hypersensitivity episode was thought to be due to complement activation to the cupramonium-rayon membrane dialyzer. Despite changing to a polyacrylonitrile membrane, which does not activate complement, a second hypersensitivity reaction developed. Suspecting ethylene oxide hypersensitivity, the third hemodialysis session incorporated a biocompatible dialyzer that was sterilized with gamma irradiation, not ethylene oxide. Yet again, an anaphylactoid reaction resulted. It was postulated that residual ethylene oxide in the tubing might have triggered this last attack.

RESULTS

Despite a negative RAST (radioallergosorbent test) to ethylene oxide, the strong history surrounding each of the hypersensitivity episodes and high index of suspicion pointed to ethylene oxide hypersensitivity as the etiologic factor. To this end, the patient fared much better when peritoneal dialysis was initiated. The patient subsequently died from other complications of his illness.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report demonstrates both the complex nature involving a hypersensitivity reaction to hemodialysis and the life-threatening severity of such a reaction. Replacing ethylene oxide with steam or gamma radiation to sterilize dialyzers and thoroughly rinsing new dialyzers and tubing with normal saline may help circumvent this problem.