Hasson H M, Rotman C, Rana N, Asakura H
Grant Hospital, P.O. Box 14898, Chicago, IL 60614-0898, USA.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993 Nov;1(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80750-9.
We conducted laparoscopic hysterectomy on 62 consecutive patients; 12 had laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), 16 had total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), and 34 had supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH). The groups were comparable with regard to age, weight, history of abdominal surgery, number of additional procedures performed, and weight of specimens; 74% had previous abdominal surgery, and 69% had additional procedures at hysterectomy. The mean estimated blood loss associated with LAVH was 2.5 times greater than that with TLH and 3 times greater than with SLH. The length of surgery was influenced by patient selection, surgeon's experience, and equipment malfunction, with a mean of 213 minutes for LAVH, 244 for TLH, and 212 for SLH. The mean hospital stay for LAVH was 1.9 days and less than 1 day for TLH and SLH. There were nine total complications in the series (15%). Twelve (19%) of the specimens showed no abnormalities on pathologic examination. Total and supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy and LAVH are appropriate operations for selected patients and compare favorably with standard abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. The procedures demand sophisticated instrumentation and a dedicated endoscopy team to ensure safe and efficient performance.
我们对62例连续患者实施了腹腔镜子宫切除术;其中12例行腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH),16例行全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH),34例行次全腹腔镜子宫切除术(SLH)。这些组在年龄、体重、腹部手术史、同期实施的附加手术数量以及标本重量方面具有可比性;74%的患者既往有腹部手术史,69%的患者在子宫切除术中实施了附加手术。LAVH的平均估计失血量比TLH多2.5倍,比SLH多3倍。手术时长受患者选择、术者经验和设备故障影响,LAVH平均为213分钟,TLH为244分钟,SLH为212分钟。LAVH的平均住院时间为1.9天,TLH和SLH则少于1天。该系列共有9例(15%)并发症。12例(19%)标本病理检查无异常。全腹腔镜子宫切除术、次全腹腔镜子宫切除术和LAVH对特定患者而言是合适的手术方式,与标准腹部或阴式子宫切除术相比具有优势。这些手术需要精密的器械和专业的内镜团队以确保安全高效地实施。