• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人体模型中比较主动按压-减压心肺复苏术(ACD-CPR)与标准心肺复苏术——减压力度、按压频率、深度和持续时间。

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) compared with standard CPR in a manikin model--decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration.

作者信息

Skogvoll E, Wik L

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Regional Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01035-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01035-0
PMID:9051818
Abstract

During active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR), the rescuer applies traction to the chest between compressions. Under experimental conditions, cardiac output increases, possibly through accentuated intrathoracal pressure fluctuations. ACD-CPR requires specific training and may be more complex to perform than standard CPR. The aim of this study was to characterize ACD-CPR performance compared with standard CPR by emergency care providers; in terms of decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration. Thirty-three ambulance paramedics were studied while performing standard CPR and ACD-CPR with the Ambu Cardiopump on a specially designed transducer-equipped manikin 9 months following initial training. The order of CPR performance was determined randomly by cross-over design. Performance data were recorded by a computer. The 2-min average active decompression force was 9.3 kg (interquartile range 2.5-15.3 kg) and six subjects (18%) met the manufacturers recommendation of 10-15 kg. External chest compression (ECC) rate decreased from 85 (70-101) to 76 (63-88) min-1 (P < 0.001), ECC depth decreased from 54 (50-58) to 45 (39-48) mm (P < 0.001) and compression duration from 40 (35-45) to 31% (28-33%) (P < 0.001) upon change from standard CPR to ACD-CPR. We conclude that the recommended level of decompression force was achieved by less than one fifth of study subjects. ACD-CPR when compared with standard CPR causes a consistent and significant reduction of compression rate, depth and duration. These are all factors of possible clinical significance. Training in ACD-CPR should address this issue, with special emphasis on optimal decompression force and ECC rate.

摘要

在主动按压-减压心肺复苏(ACD-CPR)过程中,施救者在按压间隙对胸部施加牵引。在实验条件下,心输出量增加,可能是由于胸腔内压力波动加剧。ACD-CPR需要特定培训,且执行起来可能比标准心肺复苏更复杂。本研究的目的是比较急救人员进行ACD-CPR与标准心肺复苏时的操作情况,包括减压力度、按压频率、深度和持续时间。在初次培训9个月后,33名救护车护理人员使用安普心肺复苏机在配备特殊传感器的人体模型上进行标准心肺复苏和ACD-CPR操作时接受研究。心肺复苏操作顺序通过交叉设计随机确定。性能数据由计算机记录。2分钟平均主动减压力度为9.3千克(四分位间距2.5 - 15.3千克),6名受试者(18%)达到制造商推荐的10 - 15千克。从标准心肺复苏转换为ACD-CPR后,胸外按压(ECC)频率从85(70 - 101)次/分钟降至76(63 - 88)次/分钟(P < 0.001),ECC深度从54(50 - 58)毫米降至45(39 - 48)毫米(P < 0.001),按压持续时间从40%(35 - 45)降至31%(28 - 33%)(P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,不到五分之一的研究对象达到了推荐的减压力度水平。与标准心肺复苏相比,ACD-CPR会导致按压频率、深度和持续时间持续且显著降低。这些都是可能具有临床意义的因素。ACD-CPR培训应解决这一问题,特别强调最佳减压力度和ECC频率。

相似文献

1
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) compared with standard CPR in a manikin model--decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration.在人体模型中比较主动按压-减压心肺复苏术(ACD-CPR)与标准心肺复苏术——减压力度、按压频率、深度和持续时间。
Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01035-0.
2
Measuring forces and frequency during active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a device for training, research and real CPR.主动压缩-减压心肺复苏期间的力与频率测量:一种用于训练、研究及实际心肺复苏的设备
Resuscitation. 1999 Dec;43(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00107-0.
3
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation in standing position over the patient: pros and cons of a new method.在患者上方站立位进行主动按压-减压心肺复苏:一种新方法的利弊
Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01061-1.
4
Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model.在小儿人体模型中使用粘性手套装置进行主动按压-减压心肺复苏时改善胸部回弹。
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
5
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.胸壁减压不完全:急救医疗服务人员心肺复苏操作的临床评估及替代手动胸外按压-减压技术的评估
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.007.
6
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation in standing position over the patient (ACD-S), kneeling beside the patient (ACD-B), and standard CPR: comparison of physiological and efficacy parameters.站立于患者上方实施主动按压-减压心肺复苏术(ACD-S)、跪于患者身旁实施主动按压-减压心肺复苏术(ACD-B)与标准心肺复苏术:生理及效果参数比较
Resuscitation. 1998 Jun;37(3):153-60. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00053-7.
7
Quality of mechanical, manual standard and active compression-decompression CPR on the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model.在人体模型上,对骤停部位以及转运过程中的机械心肺复苏、手动标准心肺复苏和主动按压-减压心肺复苏的质量。
Resuscitation. 1997 Jun;34(3):235-42. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01087-8.
8
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.胸壁减压不完全:对经过培训的非专业人员心肺复苏操作的临床评估及替代手动胸外按压-减压技术的评估
Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):341-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.021. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
9
Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group.主动按压-减压。一种新的心肺复苏方法。心肺复苏工作组。
JAMA. 1992 Jun 3;267(21):2916-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.21.2916.
10
Comparison of exertion required to perform standard and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.标准心肺复苏与主动按压-减压心肺复苏所需体力的比较。
Resuscitation. 1995 Feb;29(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)00812-t.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a Glove-Coach Technology Significantly Increase the Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Non-healthcare Professionals? A Controlled Trial.手套式教练技术能否显著提高非医疗专业人员心肺复苏的效果?一项对照试验。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 9;8:685988. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.685988. eCollection 2021.
2
Haemodynamic outcomes during piston-based mechanical CPR with or without active decompression in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.基于活塞的机械心肺复苏术在伴有或不伴有主动减压时对心脏骤停猪模型血流动力学的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 24;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0496-z.
3
Mapping the use of simulation in prehospital care - a literature review.
院前急救中模拟技术应用的映射——文献综述
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Mar 28;22:22. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-22.
4
Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.用于心肺复苏的主动胸外按压-减压
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2013(9):CD002751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002751.pub3.
5
Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model.在小儿人体模型中使用粘性手套装置进行主动按压-减压心肺复苏时改善胸部回弹。
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
6
Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation?不同的床垫会影响心肺复苏的质量吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Dec;29(12):2330-2335. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2014-6. Epub 2003 Sep 20.