Skogvoll E, Wik L
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Regional Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01035-0.
During active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR), the rescuer applies traction to the chest between compressions. Under experimental conditions, cardiac output increases, possibly through accentuated intrathoracal pressure fluctuations. ACD-CPR requires specific training and may be more complex to perform than standard CPR. The aim of this study was to characterize ACD-CPR performance compared with standard CPR by emergency care providers; in terms of decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration. Thirty-three ambulance paramedics were studied while performing standard CPR and ACD-CPR with the Ambu Cardiopump on a specially designed transducer-equipped manikin 9 months following initial training. The order of CPR performance was determined randomly by cross-over design. Performance data were recorded by a computer. The 2-min average active decompression force was 9.3 kg (interquartile range 2.5-15.3 kg) and six subjects (18%) met the manufacturers recommendation of 10-15 kg. External chest compression (ECC) rate decreased from 85 (70-101) to 76 (63-88) min-1 (P < 0.001), ECC depth decreased from 54 (50-58) to 45 (39-48) mm (P < 0.001) and compression duration from 40 (35-45) to 31% (28-33%) (P < 0.001) upon change from standard CPR to ACD-CPR. We conclude that the recommended level of decompression force was achieved by less than one fifth of study subjects. ACD-CPR when compared with standard CPR causes a consistent and significant reduction of compression rate, depth and duration. These are all factors of possible clinical significance. Training in ACD-CPR should address this issue, with special emphasis on optimal decompression force and ECC rate.
在主动按压-减压心肺复苏(ACD-CPR)过程中,施救者在按压间隙对胸部施加牵引。在实验条件下,心输出量增加,可能是由于胸腔内压力波动加剧。ACD-CPR需要特定培训,且执行起来可能比标准心肺复苏更复杂。本研究的目的是比较急救人员进行ACD-CPR与标准心肺复苏时的操作情况,包括减压力度、按压频率、深度和持续时间。在初次培训9个月后,33名救护车护理人员使用安普心肺复苏机在配备特殊传感器的人体模型上进行标准心肺复苏和ACD-CPR操作时接受研究。心肺复苏操作顺序通过交叉设计随机确定。性能数据由计算机记录。2分钟平均主动减压力度为9.3千克(四分位间距2.5 - 15.3千克),6名受试者(18%)达到制造商推荐的10 - 15千克。从标准心肺复苏转换为ACD-CPR后,胸外按压(ECC)频率从85(70 - 101)次/分钟降至76(63 - 88)次/分钟(P < 0.001),ECC深度从54(50 - 58)毫米降至45(39 - 48)毫米(P < 0.001),按压持续时间从40%(35 - 45)降至31%(28 - 33%)(P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,不到五分之一的研究对象达到了推荐的减压力度水平。与标准心肺复苏相比,ACD-CPR会导致按压频率、深度和持续时间持续且显著降低。这些都是可能具有临床意义的因素。ACD-CPR培训应解决这一问题,特别强调最佳减压力度和ECC频率。