Pettersson K, Hildingsson C, Toolanen G, Fagerlund M, Björnebrink J
Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 1;22(3):283-7; discussion 288. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199702010-00010.
This study was used to evaluate the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical findings after whiplash injury.
To identify initial soft-tissue damage after whiplash injury, the development of disc pathology, and the relationship of disc pathology to clinical findings.
Although a few studies have reported pathological magnetic resonance imaging findings after whiplash injuries, there is no prospective study published to our knowledge.
Thirty-nine patients, 20 women and 19 men with a mean age of 32 years, were treated for whiplash injury. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination were performed in a blinded manner at a mean of 11 days after trauma. The procedure was repeated at a 2-year follow-up visit. Two patients could not be examined with the second magnetic resonance imaging because of claustrophobia and pregnancy, respectively.
The authors found 13 patients (33%) with disc herniations with medullary (six cases) or dura (seven cases) impingement over the 2-year follow-up period. At the follow-up examination all patients with medullary impingement had persistent or increased symptoms, and three of 27 patients (11%) with no or slight changes on magnetic resonance imaging had persistent symptoms. No ligament injuries were diagnosed.
Although disc pathology seems to be one contributing factor in the development of chronic symptoms after whiplash injury, it may be unnecessary to examine these patients in the acute phase with magnetic resonance imaging; correlating initial symptoms and signs to magnetic resonance imaging findings is difficult because of the relatively high proportion of false-positive results. Magnetic resonance imaging is indicated later in the course of treatment in patients with persistent arm pain, neurologic deficits or clinical signs of nerve root compression to diagnose disc herniations requiring surgery.
本研究旨在评估挥鞭伤后磁共振成像结果与临床结果之间的关系。
确定挥鞭伤后最初的软组织损伤、椎间盘病变的发展情况,以及椎间盘病变与临床结果的关系。
尽管有少数研究报道了挥鞭伤后的病理性磁共振成像结果,但据我们所知,尚无前瞻性研究发表。
39例患者,其中20名女性和19名男性,平均年龄32岁,接受挥鞭伤治疗。在创伤后平均11天以盲法进行磁共振成像和临床检查。在2年的随访中重复该程序。分别有2例患者因幽闭恐惧症和怀孕未能进行第二次磁共振成像检查。
作者发现在2年的随访期内有13例患者(33%)出现椎间盘突出并伴有脊髓(6例)或硬脊膜(7例)受压。在随访检查中,所有脊髓受压患者均有持续或加重的症状,而27例磁共振成像无变化或仅有轻微变化的患者中有3例(11%)有持续症状。未诊断出韧带损伤。
尽管椎间盘病变似乎是挥鞭伤后慢性症状发展的一个促成因素,但在急性期对这些患者进行磁共振成像检查可能没有必要;由于假阳性结果比例相对较高,将初始症状和体征与磁共振成像结果相关联很困难。对于持续手臂疼痛、神经功能缺损或神经根受压临床体征的患者,在治疗过程后期进行磁共振成像检查以诊断需要手术的椎间盘突出。