Claxton A R, McGuire G, Chung F, Cruise C
Toronto Hospital, Western Division, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 1997 Mar;84(3):509-14. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199703000-00008.
Adequate postoperative analgesia without side effects is necessary to facilitate same-day discharge of ambulatory patients after ambulatory surgery. This study compared the use of intravenous morphine and fentanyl after painful ambulatory procedures with respect to analgesic efficacy, the incidence of side effects, and impact on the patient's readiness for discharge. Fifty-eight patients undergoing ambulatory surgery were prospectively randomized to receive morphine or fentanyl for postoperative analgesia and studied in double-blind fashion. The drugs were administered in equipotent doses in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and were titrated against pain scores until a visual analog score < 40 mm was achieved and the patient was satisfied with the level of analgesia. In the ambulatory surgical unit, oral analgesia was available. Pain scores, amount of analgesia used, the incidence of side-effects (nausea and vomiting, sedation and dizziness), the times to achieve recovery milestones, and fitness for discharge were studied. Equal amounts of morphine and fentanyl were used in the PACU, but pain scores were higher in the fentanyl group in the ambulatory surgical unit. In addition, the fentanyl group required more oral analgesia than the morphine group (69% vs 17%; P < 0.0002). The incidence of in-hospital side effects was similar. However, the morphine group had a more frequent incidence of postdischarge nausea and vomiting than the fentanyl group (59% vs 24%; P < 0.016). There was no significant difference in the duration of stay in the PACU (morphine vs fentanyl, 69 +/- 15 min vs 71 +/- 20 min), the times to achieve recovery milestones, and fitness for discharge (morphine vs fentanyl, 136 +/- 41 min vs 132 +/- 40 min). The short duration of fentanyl was not associated with faster discharge times; most patients required additional analgesia to control pain. Morphine produced a better quality of analgesia but was associated with an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting, the majority of which occurred after discharge.
为便于门诊手术患者术后当日出院,实施无副作用的充分术后镇痛很有必要。本研究比较了门诊疼痛手术后静脉注射吗啡和芬太尼在镇痛效果、副作用发生率以及对患者出院准备情况的影响。58例行门诊手术的患者被前瞻性随机分组,接受吗啡或芬太尼进行术后镇痛,并采用双盲方式进行研究。药物在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)以等效剂量给药,并根据疼痛评分进行滴定,直至视觉模拟评分<40mm且患者对镇痛水平满意。在门诊手术单元,可使用口服镇痛药。研究了疼痛评分、使用的镇痛药量、副作用(恶心呕吐、镇静和头晕)发生率、达到恢复里程碑的时间以及出院适宜性。在PACU中吗啡和芬太尼的使用量相等,但在门诊手术单元芬太尼组的疼痛评分更高。此外,芬太尼组比吗啡组需要更多的口服镇痛药(69%对17%;P<0.0002)。院内副作用发生率相似。然而,吗啡组出院后恶心呕吐的发生率比芬太尼组更高(59%对24%;P<0.016)。在PACU的停留时间(吗啡组对芬太尼组,69±15分钟对71±20分钟)、达到恢复里程碑的时间以及出院适宜性(吗啡组对芬太尼组,136±41分钟对132±40分钟)方面无显著差异。芬太尼作用时间短与更快出院时间无关;大多数患者需要额外镇痛来控制疼痛。吗啡产生的镇痛质量更好,但与恶心呕吐发生率增加有关,其中大多数发生在出院后。