• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Clinical evaluation of sulbactam/cefoperazone for lower respiratory tract infections. Correlation between the efficacy of sulbactam/cefoperazone and beta-lactamase].

作者信息

Koga H, Tomono K, Hirakata Y, Kohno S, Abe K, Kawamoto S, Kusano S, Tanaka K, Morikawa N, Sugiyama H, Katsumata T, Sasayama K, Shimoguchi K, Hashimoto A, Matsumoto Y, Inoue Y, Ishiguro M, Hori H, Mashimoto H, Dotsu Y, Tanaka H, Imamura Y, Kanda T, Hara K

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1996 Aug;49(8):800-7.

PMID:9053534
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ) were evaluated in 42 patients with respiratory tract infections, including pneumonia (29 patients) and lower respiratory tract infections (5 patients). Overall clinical efficacy rates (excellent + good) were 79% in pneumonia and 80% in respiratory tract infections in 34 patients evaluated for clinical efficacy. It was excellent that the clinical efficacy rate was 92% in mild and moderate pneumonia. Pathogens isolated from sputa were 31 strains, including 8 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 7 of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 3 of Staphylococcus aureus and 3 of Haemophilus influenzae. Since the isolates were eradicated in 18 strains, replaced in 3, unchanged in 2 and unknown in 8, the overall eradication rate was 91%. The eradication rates were 89% in beta-lactamase producing strains and 100% in beta-lactamase positive sputum, and excellent or good in 19 (83%) of 23 patients with beta-lactamase negative sputum. The eradication rate was 88% in 5 patients with beta-lactamase positive sputum. One patient experienced a moderate rash. Abnormal laboratory test values were observed in 10 patients (26.3%), but these abnormalities were mild and transient. These results suggested that SBT/CPZ was effective and safe for the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by beta-lactamase producing as well as beta-lactamase non-producing bacteria.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Clinical evaluation of sulbactam/cefoperazone for lower respiratory tract infections. Correlation between the efficacy of sulbactam/cefoperazone and beta-lactamase].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1996 Aug;49(8):800-7.
2
[Clinical evaluation of sulbactam/cefoperazone in lower respiratory tract infections].舒巴坦/头孢哌酮治疗下呼吸道感染的临床评价
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Feb;43(2):239-56.
3
Comparative in-vitro activity of cefoperazone-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against ESBL pathogens in respiratory and urinary infections.头孢哌酮-他唑巴坦与头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合用药对呼吸道和泌尿系统感染中产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)病原体的体外活性比较
J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Nov;60:22-4.
4
[Studies on sulbactam/ampicillin in the field of pediatrics].[舒巴坦/氨苄西林在儿科领域的研究]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1989 Mar;42(3):662-74.
5
[Clinical evaluation of combination therapy of sulbactam/cefoperazone and aminoglycoside in respiratory tract infections].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1994 Feb;47(2):170-80.
6
[Studies on sulbactam/cefoperazone in the field of pediatrics].[舒巴坦/头孢哌酮在儿科领域的研究]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Oct;37(10):1859-79.
7
[Synergy between sulbactam and ampicillin or cefoperazone in antimicrobial activity against beta-lactamase producing microorganisms. Results with the use of microdilution broth method].[舒巴坦与氨苄西林或头孢哌酮对产β-内酰胺酶微生物抗菌活性的协同作用。采用微量稀释肉汤法的结果]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Jul;43(7):1214-24.
8
[beta-lactamase activity in sputum of patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections].[社区获得性下呼吸道感染患者痰液中的β-内酰胺酶活性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1994 Feb;47(2):161-9.
9
[Efficacy of sulbactam/cefoperazone in respiratory tract infections in elderly patients with underlying respiratory diseases].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1996 Jul;49(7):710-4.
10
[Effects of sulbactam/cefoperazone in patients with respiratory infections in aged and/or with underlying respiratory diseases].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1989 Apr;42(4):910-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of green micellar HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of some sulbactam combinations used in COVID-19 regimen.用于同时测定新冠治疗方案中某些舒巴坦组合的绿色胶束高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测法的开发
BMC Chem. 2023 Aug 5;17(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13065-023-01006-0.
2
Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Induced Abdominal Wall Hematoma and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦致腹壁血肿及上消化道出血:1例病例报告并文献复习
Drug Saf Case Rep. 2016 Dec;3(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s40800-016-0025-9.
3
A multicentre clinical study on the injection of ceftriaxone/sulbactam compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.
头孢曲松/舒巴坦与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗呼吸道和尿路感染的多中心临床研究。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013 Dec 9;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-38.