Suppr超能文献

[标准体积与小体积血浆置换术治疗支气管哮喘和慢性支气管炎患者的临床疗效比较评估]

[A comparative assessment of the clinical efficacy of standard and low-volume plasmapheresis in treating patients with bronchial asthma and chronic bronchitis].

作者信息

Provotorov V M, Gaĭkovich A A

出版信息

Ter Arkh. 1996;68(12):28-30.

PMID:9054033
Abstract

21 patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive bronchitis resistant to standard therapy have been exposed to discrete plasmapheresis. Changes in the bronchial tree inflammation measured by fibre bronchoscopy and activity of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in bronchial wash-offs made it clear that low-volume plasmapheresis is not inferior in efficacy to the standard method. The trend in the fall of NSE activity as a marker of diffuse neuroendocrine system objectively reflects attenuating inflammation in bronchial mucosa in response to treatment of chronic obstructive diseases of the lungs using different techniques of plasmapheresis.

摘要

21名对标准治疗有抵抗的支气管哮喘和慢性阻塞性支气管炎患者接受了间断性血浆置换治疗。通过纤维支气管镜检查测量支气管树炎症的变化以及支气管灌洗中神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的活性表明,小容量血浆置换在疗效上并不逊于标准方法。作为弥漫性神经内分泌系统标志物的NSE活性下降趋势客观地反映了使用不同血浆置换技术治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病时支气管黏膜炎症的减轻。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验