Acton G J, Irvin B L, Jensen B A, Hopkins B A, Miller E W
University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, USA.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1997 Mar;19(3):78-85. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199703000-00008.
Debates about methodological diversity and the most appropriate paradigm for scientific inquiry are still flourishing within the community of nurse scholars. Rather than continuing to debate these controversies, the authors of this article suggest that nurse researchers set aside methodological differences and move to discover the truths that will build the foundational base of nursing practice and, thus advance the discipline. This article discusses the multiple methodological perspectives used to explicate middle-range concepts from the theory and paradigm for nursing, Modeling and Role-Modeling. Each author will demonstrate how combining different approaches and methodologies can be helpful in exploring and validating middle-range concepts.
关于方法多样性以及科学探究最合适范式的争论在护理学者群体中仍在激烈进行。本文作者建议,护理研究者暂且搁置方法上的差异,转而探寻那些将构建护理实践基础并推动该学科发展的真理,而非继续争论这些争议。本文讨论了用于从护理理论和范式“塑造与榜样塑造”中阐释中程概念的多种方法论视角。每位作者将展示如何结合不同的方法和方法论有助于探索和验证中程概念。