Ury C
Psychoanal Q. 1997 Jan;66(1):34-61.
The systematic terms of metapsychology expressed in Freud's theory of oedipal guilt have overshadowed his emergent ideas about preoedipal internal objects and preoedipal guilt. This article reconstructs the latent theory of preoedipal guilt in his notions of narcissism, fantasy, aggression, and ambivalence. Special attention is devoted to his discussions of the narcissistic function of creating fantasized objects through identificatory processes, in order to compensate for loss or disturbances in object relating. Although Freud put forward the notion of oedipal guilt as a derivative of secondary mental processes, he intuitively grasped that guilt emerges from the conflict-bound sphere of preoedipal relations. "A Child Is Being Beaten" is used as an illustration, as are clinical examples drawn from the author's practice.
弗洛伊德俄狄浦斯内疚理论中所表达的元心理学系统术语,掩盖了他关于前俄狄浦斯期内部客体和前俄狄浦斯期内疚的新观点。本文在他关于自恋、幻想、攻击性和矛盾情感的概念中重构了前俄狄浦斯期内疚的潜在理论。特别关注他对通过认同过程创造幻想客体的自恋功能的讨论,以弥补客体关系中的丧失或干扰。尽管弗洛伊德提出俄狄浦斯内疚的概念是次级心理过程的衍生物,但他直观地认识到内疚源于前俄狄浦斯期关系的冲突领域。以《一个正在被打的孩子》为例,并引用了作者临床实践中的实例。