• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种评估实验毒理学和生态毒理学数据质量的系统方法。

A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data.

作者信息

Klimisch H J, Andreae M, Tillmann U

机构信息

BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Feb;25(1):1-5. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.

DOI:10.1006/rtph.1996.1076
PMID:9056496
Abstract

The evaluation of the quality of data and their use in hazard and risk assessment as a systematic approach is described. Definitions are proposed for reliability, relevance, and adequacy of data. Reliability is differentiated into four categories. Criteria relating to international testing standards for categorizing reliability are developed. A systematic documentation of evaluating reliability especially for use in the IUCLID database is proposed. This approach is intended to harmonize data evaluation processes worldwide. It may help the expert in subsequent assessments and should increase the clarity of evaluation.

摘要

本文描述了作为一种系统方法的数据质量评估及其在危害和风险评估中的应用。提出了数据可靠性、相关性和充分性的定义。可靠性分为四类。制定了与用于对可靠性进行分类的国际测试标准相关的标准。提出了一种系统的可靠性评估文档,特别是用于IUCLID数据库。这种方法旨在使全球的数据评估过程协调一致。它可能有助于专家进行后续评估,并应提高评估的清晰度。

相似文献

1
A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data.一种评估实验毒理学和生态毒理学数据质量的系统方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Feb;25(1):1-5. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.
2
Regulatory demands on data quality for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.药品环境风险评估的数据质量监管要求。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;55(3):276-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
3
A systematic approach for evaluating and scoring human data.一种评估和评分人类数据的系统方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;66(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
Neurotoxicity test validation, positive controls and proficiency: are chemicals necessary?神经毒性试验验证、阳性对照与能力验证:化学品是否必要?
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005 Jul-Aug;27(4):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.05.008.
5
Databases applicable to quantitative hazard/risk assessment--towards a predictive systems toxicology.适用于定量危害/风险评估的数据库——迈向预测性系统毒理学
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008 Nov 15;233(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.036. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
6
A qualitative retrospective analysis of positive control data in developmental neurotoxicity studies.发育神经毒性研究中阳性对照数据的定性回顾性分析。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.02.007.
7
Landscape of current toxicity databases and database standards.当前毒性数据库及数据库标准概述
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2006 Jan;9(1):124-33.
8
Quality control and reliability of reported doses.报告剂量的质量控制与可靠性
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;112(1):169-89. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch287.
9
A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.毒理学家诊断测试研究指南。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(3):171-9.
10
An Integrated Assessment Scheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data under REACH.用于评估 REACH 下(生态)毒理学数据充分性的综合评估方案。
Toxicol Lett. 2010 Oct 5;198(2):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Ecotoxicological Hazard Assessment of Chemicals by Pairwise Learning.通过成对学习改进化学品的生态毒理学危害评估
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 12;59(31):16250-16260. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c01289. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Assessing risk of bias in toxicological studies in the era of artificial intelligence.评估人工智能时代毒理学研究中的偏倚风险。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Aug;99(8):3065-3090. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-03978-5.
3
Characterization of medical device constituents and development of duration-based non-cancer threshold of toxicological concern values.
医疗器械成分的表征及基于持续时间的毒理学关注阈值的非癌症阈值的制定。
Front Toxicol. 2025 Jun 4;7:1600127. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1600127. eCollection 2025.
4
Identification of Compounds With Potential Dual Inhibitory Activity Against Drug Efflux Pumps in Resistant Cancer Cells and Bacteria: Protocol for a Systematic Review.鉴定对耐药癌细胞和细菌中的药物外排泵具有潜在双重抑制活性的化合物:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 5;14:e66197. doi: 10.2196/66197.
5
Intergenerational and transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the offspring brain development and behavior.内分泌干扰化学物质对后代大脑发育和行为的代际及跨代影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 21;16:1571689. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1571689. eCollection 2025.
6
Effect of Ochratoxin A (OTA) on the Immune System: A Systematic Review.赭曲霉毒素A(OTA)对免疫系统的影响:一项系统综述。
Toxins (Basel). 2025 May 20;17(5):256. doi: 10.3390/toxins17050256.
7
Applicability of In Silico New Approach Methods for the Risk Assessment of Tattoo Ink Ingredients.计算机模拟新方法在纹身油墨成分风险评估中的适用性
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025 Apr;66(4):199-209. doi: 10.1002/em.70010.
8
Hypothesis-driven weight of evidence evaluation indicates ethylbenzene lacks endocrine disruption potential by EATS pathways.基于假设的证据权重评估表明,乙苯通过EATS途径缺乏内分泌干扰潜力。
EXCLI J. 2025 Mar 27;24:479-507. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7822. eCollection 2025.
9
Investigating the impact of the dispersion protocol on the physico-chemical identity and toxicity of nanomaterials: a review of the literature with focus on TiO particles.研究分散方案对纳米材料物理化学特性及毒性的影响:聚焦TiO颗粒的文献综述
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2025 May 13;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12989-025-00627-8.
10
Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on methyl -butyl ether supporting a lack of concern for carcinogenic hazard in humans based on animal cancer studies and mechanistic data.基于动物癌症研究和机制数据,对甲基丁基醚证据库进行系统评估,以支持对其在人类中致癌风险无需担忧的观点。
Curr Res Toxicol. 2025 Feb 16;8:100224. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100224. eCollection 2025.