Griffiths C, Sturdy P, Naish J, Omar R, Dolan S, Feder G
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's, London.
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):482-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.482.
To determine the relative importance of appropriate prescribing for asthma in explaining high rates of hospital admission for asthma among east London general practices.
Poisson regression analysis describing relation of each general practice's admission rates for asthma with prescribing for asthma and characteristics of general practitioners, practices, and practice populations.
East London, a deprived inner city area with high admission rates for asthma.
All 163 general practices in East London and the City Health Authority (complete data available for 124 practices).
Admission rates for asthma, excluding readmissions, for ages 5-64 years; ratio of asthma prophylaxis to bronchodilator prescribing; selected characteristics of general practitioners, practices, and practice populations.
Median admission rate for asthma was 0.9 (range 0-3.6) per 1000 patients per year. Higher admission rates were most strongly associated with small size of practice partnership: admission rates of singlehanded and two partner practices were higher than those of practices with three or more principals by 1.7 times (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 2.0, P < 0.001) and 1.3 times (1.1 to 1.6, P = 0.001) respectively. Practices with higher rates of night visits also had significantly higher admission rates: an increase in night visiting rate by 10 visits per 1000 patients over two years was associated with an increase in admission rates for asthma by 4% (1% to 7%). These associations were independent of asthma prescribing ratios, measures of practice resources, and characteristics of practice populations.
Higher asthma admission rates in east London practices were most strongly associated with smaller partnership size and higher rates of night visiting. Evaluating ways of helping smaller partnerships develop structured proactive care for asthma patients at high risk of admission is a priority.
确定哮喘合理用药在解释东伦敦全科医疗中哮喘高住院率方面的相对重要性。
采用泊松回归分析,描述各全科医疗的哮喘住院率与哮喘用药以及全科医生、医疗机构和就医人群特征之间的关系。
东伦敦,一个贫困的市中心区域,哮喘住院率较高。
东伦敦和城市卫生局的所有163家全科医疗(124家有完整数据)。
5 - 64岁哮喘患者(不包括再次入院者)的住院率;哮喘预防用药与支气管扩张剂用药的比例;全科医生、医疗机构和就医人群的选定特征。
哮喘的年住院率中位数为每1000名患者0.9(范围0 - 3.6)。较高的住院率与小型医疗合作伙伴关系密切相关:单人执业和两人合伙执业的住院率分别比有三名或更多负责人的执业高出1.7倍(95%置信区间1.4至2.0,P < 0.001)和1.3倍(1.1至1.6,P = 0.001)。夜间出诊率较高的医疗机构住院率也显著更高:每1000名患者两年内夜间出诊率增加10次与哮喘住院率增加4%(1%至7%)相关。这些关联独立于哮喘用药比例、医疗机构资源指标和就医人群特征。
东伦敦医疗机构中较高的哮喘住院率与较小的合作伙伴规模和较高的夜间出诊率密切相关。优先评估帮助小型合作伙伴为有高住院风险的哮喘患者开展结构化主动护理的方法。