Gao H Z, Hunt S A, Alderman E L, Liang D, Yeung A C, Schroeder J S
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 1;29(3):623-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00521-9.
This study assessed the influence of donor age and preexisting donor coronary disease on the later development of allograft coronary artery disease, ischemic events and overall survival.
The increasing demand for heart donors has led to a tendency to liberalize age criteria for donor acceptability.
A total of 233 consecutive heart transplant recipients who had baseline, early postoperative and follow-up coronary angiograms, as well as a subset of 47 patients with baseline intracoronary ultrasound imaging recordings, were analyzed (mean 3.8 years of follow-up). Patients were subclassified according to the presence of donor coronary artery disease on the baseline angiogram and stratified at age 40 years.
patients without evidence of preexisting coronary artery disease on a baseline angiogram (n = 219) were significantly less likely to develop new disease than the 14 patients with preexisting coronary artery disease (p = 0.002). Although older donors exhibited earlier coronary artery disease than younger donors at 3 years of follow-up, there was no difference by 5 years (p = 0.25). There was no difference in survival or probability of developing ischemic events between the groups. Baseline ultrasound imaging revealed substantial disease in 7 of 9 older donated hearts, and in only 7 of 38 younger donated hearts (p = 0.002). Preexisting coronary artery disease, nonuse of calcium channel blocking agents, older donor age, posttransplantation cytomegalovirus infection, elevated very low density lipoprotein levels and previous ischemic heart disease in the recipient were significant predictors of allograft coronary artery disease.
Heart donors with angiographic evidence of preexisting coronary artery disease and older donors are more likely to develop new allograft coronary artery disease by 3 years. However, there is no difference in survival or freedom from ischemic events between younger and older donors at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years.
本研究评估供体年龄和供体既往冠心病对移植后冠状动脉疾病、缺血事件及总体生存率后期发展的影响。
对心脏供体需求的增加导致放宽供体可接受年龄标准的趋势。
分析了233例连续的心脏移植受者,这些受者有基线、术后早期及随访冠状动脉造影,以及47例有基线冠状动脉内超声成像记录的患者子集(平均随访3.8年)。根据基线血管造影时供体冠状动脉疾病的存在情况对患者进行亚分类,并按40岁年龄分层。
基线血管造影无既往冠状动脉疾病证据的患者(n = 219)比14例有既往冠状动脉疾病的患者发生新疾病的可能性显著降低(p = 0.002)。尽管在随访3年时,老年供体比年轻供体更早出现冠状动脉疾病,但在5年时无差异(p = 0.25)。两组在生存率或发生缺血事件的概率上无差异。基线超声成像显示,9例老年供心中有7例有严重病变,而38例年轻供心中仅有7例(p = 0.002)。既往冠状动脉疾病、未使用钙通道阻滞剂、供体年龄较大、移植后巨细胞病毒感染、极低密度脂蛋白水平升高以及受者既往缺血性心脏病是移植后冠状动脉疾病的重要预测因素。
血管造影有既往冠状动脉疾病证据的心脏供体和老年供体在3年内更有可能发生新的移植后冠状动脉疾病。然而,在平均随访3.8年时,年轻和老年供体在生存率或无缺血事件方面无差异。