Burke F J
Unit of Dental Practice, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, England.
Quintessence Int. 1996 Feb;27(2):115-21.
This investigation assessed the effect of variations in preparation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic crowns placed with a resin composite luting material after the dentinal surface had been treated with a dentinal bonding system. Four groups of 10 sound, unrestored, maxillary premolars were prepared. In group A, minimal preparations of 6-degree taper, 2-mm occlusal reduction, and a knife-edged margin were carried out. Preparations in group B received 6-degree taper, 3-mm occlusal reduction, and a 1-mm shoulder. Preparations in group C were as in group B, but with 2-mm occlusal reduction over buccal cusp and minimal cervical preparation buccally. Preparations in group D were as in group B, but with 2-mm occlusal reduction. The restored teeth were subjected to compressive loading. Mean fracture loads of 0.77 kN, 0.99 kN, 0.91 kN, and 0.78 kN were recorded for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. Statistical analysis failed to reveal any difference among the groups.
本研究评估了在牙本质表面经牙本质粘结系统处理后,使用树脂复合粘结材料粘结全瓷冠修复牙齿时,不同预备方式对牙齿抗折性的影响。制备了四组,每组10颗完好、未修复的上颌前磨牙。A组进行最小预备,锥度为6度,咬合面降低2毫米,边缘为刃状。B组预备锥度为6度,咬合面降低3毫米,有1毫米宽的肩台。C组的预备与B组相同,但颊尖处咬合面降低2毫米,颊侧颈部预备最小。D组的预备与B组相同,但咬合面降低2毫米。修复后的牙齿承受压缩载荷。A、B、C、D组的平均折裂载荷分别记录为0.77 kN、0.99 kN、0.91 kN和0.78 kN。统计分析未显示各组之间有任何差异。