Burke F J, Watts D C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, England.
Quintessence Int. 1994 May;25(5):335-40.
While dentin-bonded crowns may hold esthetic advantages over metal-ceramic restorations, and minimal tooth preparation may also be appropriate, resistance to fracture of the restored unit is an important consideration. Dentin-bonded crowns were placed on standardized preparations in two groups of 10 maxillary premolar teeth in vitro. The preparations differed only in degree of taper. The restored specimens were subjected to compressive loading at 1 mm/min from a steel bar placed along the midline fissure. Mean fracture loads of 0.77 kN (6-degree taper) and 0.71 kN (8-degree taper) were recorded for the groups of prepared teeth, and a mean fracture load of 0.97 kN was obtained for a group of unprepared controls. Statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the fracture load of the 6-degree taper group and that of the sound control teeth.
虽然粘结牙本质冠相对于金属烤瓷修复体可能具有美学优势,并且最小化牙体预备也可能是合适的,但修复体的抗折性是一个重要的考虑因素。在体外,将粘结牙本质冠放置在两组各10颗上颌前磨牙的标准化预备体上。这些预备体仅在锥度程度上有所不同。将修复后的标本从沿着中线裂隙放置的钢棒处以1mm/分钟的速度进行压缩加载。对于预备牙组,记录到6度锥度组的平均折裂载荷为0.77kN,8度锥度组为0.71kN,而一组未预备的对照组获得的平均折裂载荷为0.97kN。统计分析表明,6度锥度组的折裂载荷与完好对照牙的折裂载荷之间没有显著差异。