Suppr超能文献

电极位置对心房颤动低能量心内电复律结果的影响。

Effect of electrode position on outcome of low-energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Alt E, Schmitt C, Ammer R, Plewan A, Evans F, Pasquantonio J, Ideker T, Lehmann G, Pütter K, Schömig A

机构信息

1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technischen Universitat München, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1997 Mar 1;79(5):621-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00827-2.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the new method of low-energy, catheter-based intracardiac cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and to compare 2 different lead positions. Accordingly, we prospectively studied 80 consecutive patients with chronic AF (9.8 +/- 7.9 months) who were randomly assigned to undergo internal cardioversion either via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and coronary sinus (coronary sinus group) or via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and left pulmonary artery (pulmonary artery group). Intracardiac shocks were delivered by an external defibrillator synchronized to the QRS complex. After conversion, all patients were treated orally with sotalol (mean daily dose, 189 +/- 63 mg/day). For conversion to sinus rhythm, the overall mean energy requirement was 5.6 +/- 3.1 J. In the coronary sinus group, cardioversion was achieved in 35 of 38 patients at a mean energy level of 4.1 +/- 2.3 J (range 1.0 to 9.9), and in the pulmonary artery group in 39 of 42 patients with 7.2 +/- 3.1 J (range 2.5 to 14.8). Although there was no difference with regard to success rate, the energy differed significantly between the 2 groups (p < 0.01). Mean lead impedance was 56.4 +/- 7.0 omega and 54.6 +/- 8.5 omega, respectively (p = NS). No serious complications were observed in either lead group. At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 7.0 months, 54% and 56%, respectively, of patients who had been converted successfully remained in sinus rhythm. Thus, low-energy biphasic shocks delivered between the right atrium and coronary sinus or pulmonary artery are equally effective for cardioversion of patients with chronic AF. The energy requirements for conversion from a pulmonary artery electrode position are higher than for the coronary sinus position.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估慢性心房颤动(AF)患者基于导管的低能量心内复律新方法,并比较两种不同的导联位置。因此,我们前瞻性地研究了80例连续的慢性AF患者(9.8±7.9个月),他们被随机分配接受心内复律,要么通过置于右心房和冠状窦的除颤电极(冠状窦组),要么通过置于右心房和左肺动脉的除颤电极(肺动脉组)。心内电击由与QRS波群同步的体外除颤器发放。复律后,所有患者口服索他洛尔(平均日剂量,189±63mg/天)。对于转为窦性心律,总体平均能量需求为5.6±3.1J。在冠状窦组,38例患者中的35例在平均能量水平4.1±2.3J(范围1.0至9.9)时实现复律,在肺动脉组,42例患者中的39例在7.2±3.1J(范围2.5至14.8)时实现复律。尽管成功率无差异,但两组之间的能量差异显著(p<0.01)。平均导联阻抗分别为56.4±7.0Ω和54.6±8.5Ω(p=无显著性差异)。两组均未观察到严重并发症。平均随访14.2±7.0个月时,成功复律的患者分别有54%和56%维持窦性心律。因此,在右心房和冠状窦或肺动脉之间发放的低能量双相电击对慢性AF患者的复律同样有效。从肺动脉电极位置转为窦性心律的能量需求高于冠状窦位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验