Lévy S, Ricard P, Gueunoun M, Yapo F, Trigano J, Mansouri C, Paganelli F
Cardiology Division, School of Medicine, University of Marseilles, France.
Circulation. 1997 Jul 1;96(1):253-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.1.253.
Recent studies have suggested that induced atrial fibrillation (AF) could be successfully terminated by using a two-catheter electrode system and low energy (< 400 V). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-energy cardioversion in spontaneous chronic and paroxysmal AF.
Forty-two consecutive patients with spontaneous AF underwent low-energy electrical cardioversion. AF was chronic (> or = 1 month) with a mean duration of 9 +/- 19 months in 28 patients (group I) or paroxysmal with a history of recurrent attacks and a mean duration of the present episode of 7 +/- 16 days in 14 patients (group II). An underlying heart disease was present in 28 patients. A 3/3-ms biphasic shock was delivered between catheters positioned in the right atrium and the coronary sinus in 32 patients. In 10 patients, the left pulmonary artery branch was used. The catheters were connected to a custom external defibrillator. The shocks were synchronized to the R wave. Following a test shock of 60 V, the energy was increased in 40-V steps until a maximum of 400 V or restoration of sinus rhythm. Sinus rhythm was restored in 22 of the 28 patients (78%) of group I by using a mean leading-edge voltage of 297 +/- 57 V (mean energy 3.3 +/- 1.3 J) and in 11 of 14 patients (78%) of group II by using a mean leading-edge voltage of 223 +/- 41 V (mean energy, 1.8 +/- 0.7 J). The energy required for terminating chronic AF was significantly (P < .001) higher than that required for terminating paroxysmal AF. Among the other variables studied, the duration of AF significantly affected the successful voltage. Ventricular proarrhythmia occurred in 1 patient with atrial flutter due to an unsynchronized shock. Of the 22 patients of group I in whom sinus rhythm was restored, 14 (63%) remained in sinus rhythm with a mean follow-up of 9 +/- 3 months. Pain level showed a good correlation with increasing voltage. However, a marked inter-individual variation was noted.
Atrial defibrillation using low energy between two intracardiac catheters with an electrical field between the right and left atria and the protocol used is feasible in patients with persistent spontaneous AF. The technique is safe provided synchronization to the R wave is achieved. A low recurrence rate of AF was seen in patients in whom sinus rhythm was restored.
最近的研究表明,使用双导管电极系统和低能量(<400V)可成功终止诱发性心房颤动(AF)。本研究评估了低能量心脏复律在自发性慢性和阵发性AF中的疗效和安全性。
42例连续的自发性AF患者接受了低能量心脏电复律。AF为慢性(≥1个月),28例患者(I组)平均持续时间为9±19个月;或为阵发性,有复发史,14例患者(II组)本次发作平均持续时间为7±16天。28例患者存在基础心脏病。32例患者在位于右心房和冠状窦的导管之间给予3/3毫秒双相电击。10例患者使用左肺动脉分支。导管连接到定制的体外除颤器。电击与R波同步。在60V的测试电击后,能量以40V的步长增加,直至最大400V或恢复窦性心律。I组28例患者中有22例(78%)恢复窦性心律,平均前沿电压为297±57V(平均能量3.3±1.3J);II组14例患者中有11例(78%)恢复窦性心律,平均前沿电压为223±41V(平均能量1.8±0.7J)。终止慢性AF所需的能量显著高于终止阵发性AF所需的能量(P<.001)。在研究的其他变量中,AF的持续时间显著影响成功复律所需的电压。1例房扑患者因电击不同步发生室性心律失常。I组恢复窦性心律的22例患者中,14例(63%)在平均9±3个月的随访中维持窦性心律。疼痛程度与电压升高呈良好相关性。然而,个体间差异明显。
对于持续性自发性AF患者,使用两个心内导管在左右心房之间形成电场并采用该方案进行低能量心房除颤是可行的。只要实现与R波同步,该技术就是安全的。恢复窦性心律的患者AF复发率较低。