Peloquin C A
Infectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Feb;32(2):132-44. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732020-00004.
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is an infrequent pulmonary pathogen in immunocompetent hosts. In patients with AIDS, MAC causes disseminated infection (DMAC) in up to 50% of those with CD4+ counts less than 100 cells/mm3. A significant portion of the total body burden of MAC is found inside macrophages, and the distribution of organisms has implications for drug therapy. Clarithromycin, azithromycin, and rifabutin all appear to enter these cells well; rifampicin (rifampin), ethambutol, ciprofloxacin, and other agents also appear to enter these cells. MAC susceptibility is probably best tested using the radiometric method (BACTEC). Susceptibility break-points have been proposed for the various anti-MAC agents; however, solid clinical correlations have been achieved only for clarithromycin. Further research is required to establish break-points for the other agents. Based on current data, azithromycin and clarithromycin appear to be key drugs in the treatment of MAC, while rifabutin has been used more often than rifampicin in studies involving patients with AIDS. Among the drugs traditionally used for M. tuberculosis (TB), ethambutol, rifampicin and streptomycin are perhaps the most useful for MAC. Amikacin and clofazimine may also be useful. The limited data available on AIDS patients with MAC, plus additional data from AIDS patients with TB, suggest that malabsorption of the oral antimycobacterial drugs is common. Some drugs (rifampicin and ethambutol) appear to be particularly affected. Because most of the studies of DMAC have not evaluated the pharmacokinetics of the drugs, questions of drug efficacy cannot be separated from questions of biovailability. This significant oversight in study design should be eliminated from future investigations. Patient-specific susceptibility data combined with therapeutic drug monitoring and dosage individualisation is one way to identify problems with drug therapy and to overcome them. Because many of the drugs used in patients with AIDS affect the metabolism of concurrently used drugs, therapeutic drug monitoring is a valuable asset for untangling multiple drug interactions. Since drug therapy is the only aspect of a mycobacterial infection within our control, the better we control the drug therapy, the better our patients should do.
鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)在免疫功能正常的宿主中是一种不常见的肺部病原体。在艾滋病患者中,CD4+细胞计数低于100个细胞/mm³的患者中,高达50%会发生播散性感染(DMAC)。MAC在全身负担中的很大一部分存在于巨噬细胞内,病原体的分布对药物治疗有影响。克拉霉素、阿奇霉素和利福布汀似乎都能很好地进入这些细胞;利福平、乙胺丁醇、环丙沙星和其他药物似乎也能进入这些细胞。MAC的药敏试验可能最好采用放射性方法(BACTEC)。已针对各种抗MAC药物提出了药敏断点;然而,仅克拉霉素实现了可靠的临床相关性。需要进一步研究以确定其他药物的断点。根据现有数据,阿奇霉素和克拉霉素似乎是治疗MAC的关键药物,而在涉及艾滋病患者的研究中,利福布汀的使用频率高于利福平。在传统用于治疗结核分枝杆菌(TB)的药物中,乙胺丁醇、利福平和链霉素可能对MAC最有用。阿米卡星和氯法齐明也可能有用。关于艾滋病合并MAC患者的有限数据,以及艾滋病合并TB患者的其他数据表明,口服抗分枝杆菌药物吸收不良很常见。一些药物(利福平和乙胺丁醇)似乎受影响尤为明显。由于大多数DMAC研究未评估药物的药代动力学,药物疗效问题无法与生物利用度问题分开。研究设计中的这一重大疏忽应在未来研究中消除。结合患者特异性药敏数据、治疗药物监测和剂量个体化是识别药物治疗问题并克服这些问题的一种方法。由于艾滋病患者使用的许多药物会影响同时使用药物的代谢,治疗药物监测对于理清多种药物相互作用是一项宝贵的资产。由于药物治疗是我们能够控制的分枝杆菌感染的唯一方面,我们对药物治疗控制得越好,患者的情况应该就越好。