Suppr超能文献

唐氏综合征的血清筛查:健康专业人员了解多少?

Serum screening for Down's syndrome: how much do health professionals know?

作者信息

Sadler M

机构信息

Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority, UK.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Feb;104(2):176-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11040.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess knowledge about serum screening for Down's syndrome in health professionals involved in antenatal care.

DESIGN

Postal questionnaire survey of knowledge of performance and interpretation of serum screening.

SETTING

Portsmouth and South East Hampshire health district.

POPULATION

All health professionals likely to be involved in antenatal care.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to all general practitioners (n = 288), hospital midwives (n = 129), community midwives (n = 71), and obstetricians (n = 29) working in the district.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total number of correct responses given to eight factual questions and percentage of correct responses to each individual question.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 434 health professionals (84%). Fifty-nine percent of health professionals correctly answered only a half or less of the factual questions on serum screening. Questions relating to the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were particularly poorly answered. Obstetricians scored most highly. General practitioners scored significantly less than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women need accurate information to give informed consent to serum screening. Most health professionals likely to be involved in antenatal care in this district do not fully understand the test and are thus unlikely to provide such information. Changes in the provision of maternity services following Changing Childbirth may increase the input of midwives and general practitioners. Training of professionals about serum screening should be reviewed.

摘要

目的

评估参与产前护理的卫生专业人员对唐氏综合征血清筛查的了解情况。

设计

通过邮寄问卷对血清筛查的执行和解读知识进行调查。

地点

朴次茅斯和汉普郡东南部卫生区。

研究对象

所有可能参与产前护理的卫生专业人员。

方法

向该地区工作的所有全科医生(n = 288)、医院助产士(n = 129)、社区助产士(n = 71)和产科医生(n = 29)发放问卷。

主要观察指标

对八个事实性问题给出的正确回答总数以及每个问题的正确回答百分比。

结果

共收到434名卫生专业人员的回复(84%)。59%的卫生专业人员正确回答的血清筛查事实性问题仅占一半或更少。与敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值相关的问题回答尤其糟糕。产科医生得分最高。全科医生的得分明显低于其他组。

结论

女性需要准确信息才能对血清筛查做出知情同意。该地区大多数可能参与产前护理的卫生专业人员并未完全理解此项检查,因此不太可能提供此类信息。《改变分娩方式》实施后产妇服务提供方式的改变可能会增加助产士和全科医生的参与度。应对专业人员进行血清筛查培训进行审查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验