Aitken T H, Downs W G, Shope R E
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977 Sep;26(5 Pt 1):985-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1977.26.985.
Three geographical strains of Aedes aegypti from Thailand (Amphur), East Africa (Kampala), and the West Indies (Santo Domingo) were compared for susceptibility to infection with low-passage yellow fever virus (French viscerotropic) as well as for ability to transmit virus by bite at varying extrinsic incubation periods. Santo Domingo strain appeared the most competent and Kampala the least when mosquitoes were exposed to a low level virus-infecting blood meal; at higher virus levels, a similar trend was noted but differences were less evident and in no case were the differences statistically significant. All three strains were infected with and transmitted yellow fever virus.
对来自泰国（安帕瓦）、东非（坎帕拉）和西印度群岛（圣多明各）的三种埃及伊蚊地理株进行了比较，以研究它们对低传代黄热病病毒（法国嗜内脏型）感染的易感性，以及在不同外在潜伏期通过叮咬传播病毒的能力。当蚊子接触低水平病毒感染血餐时，圣多明各株似乎最具传播能力，而坎帕拉株最弱；在病毒水平较高时，也观察到类似趋势，但差异不太明显，且在任何情况下差异均无统计学意义。所有这三个株系都感染并传播了黄热病病毒。
