Suppr超能文献

Clinical epidemiology and osteoporosis. Measures and their interpretation.

作者信息

Sowers M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1997 Mar;26(1):219-31. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70241-3.

Abstract

Identifying patients with a high risk of fracture and monitoring a patient's therapeutic response are important. Current methods to evaluate the risk of fracture include the measurement of bone mineral density as well as other risk factors, including those associated with the risk of falling. Several considerations are important in defining the risk for fracture. There is currently no level of bone mineral density at which the risk of fracture is zero, that is, some high-risk women will not have a fracture and some low-risk women will. The monitoring of high-risk individuals for subtle changes in their bone status is not economically feasible at this time. Given the precision of current measurement technology, it is more reasonable to expect to monitor individuals on a 3- to 5-year basis rather than every 6 months to 1 year. There is no single optimal site at which measurement is highly precise and predictive of bone mineral density measurement at other skeletal locations. Currently, measurement of the femoral neck seems to have the most universal applicability. Measurement of bone turnover markers remains more effective as a research tool and is less effective as a method to diagnose or monitor the bone status of individual patients.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验