Herbst H, Ketabi A, Thier P, Dichgans J
Department of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;104(1):82-90. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(96)95722-6.
We compared the diagnostic sensitivity of traditional visual tests such as the Snellen-test and pattern reversal VEPs with psychophysical and electrophysiological tests involving motion processing and psychophysical tests of contrast processing in detecting visual deficits in a group of MS patients. A total of 30 patients with a definite diagnosis of MS and 22 age-matched controls selected from a pool of healthy volunteers participated in this study. Visual evoked potentials elicited by reversing checkerboards and moving random dot patterns (motion-onset VEPs) were recorded. The recognition of motion-defined forms (motion-defined letter test, MDL-test) and of contrast reduced optotypes was measured psychophysically. Of 30 patients, 29 showed deficits in at least one of the tests applied. The highest detection rate was obtained for a simple psychophysical test, the MDL-test, which revealed abnormalities in 80% of the patients. This is about 12% more than pattern VEPs could detect. Conversely, abnormalities in motion-onset VEPs were found in only 16% of the patients. Our results show that by adding a simple psychophysical test of form-from-motion analysis our capability to demonstrate an involvement of the visual system in MS patients may be promoted considerably.
