Benoit H, Busso T, Prieur F, Castells J, Freyssenet D, Lacour J R, Denis C, Geyssant A
Laboratoire de Physiologie-GIP Exercice, Université Jean Monnet, Faculté de Médecine Saint Etienne, France.
Int J Sports Med. 1997 Feb;18(2):101-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972603.
The effect of acute hypoxia on oxygen uptake (VO2) was studied during incremental (IE) and constant work load exercises. Twenty-two healthy subjects performed two incremental exercises on a bicycle ergometer under normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (10.4% O2) conditions. Fifteen subjects performed a constant work load exercise at the same absolute power (CAP) (116 +/- 33 W), while seven other subjects performed three constant work load exercises at the same relative power (CRP) (50, 60 and 70% of VO2max) in both conditions. VO2 was defined as extraventilatory when the estimation of respiratory muscles O2 consumption was subtracted from the total VO2. During IE, the slope of the linear regression relating VO2 to work rate was higher in normoxia than in hypoxia (11.6 +/- 1.2 ml.l-1.W-1 vs 10.1 +/- 1.1 ml.l-1.W-1, p < 0.01). During CAP, VO2 was lower in normoxia than in hypoxia (1.88 +/- 0.45).min-1 vs 1.96 +/- 0.42 l.min-1, p < 0.01) whereas extraventilatory VO2 was not significantly different (1.80 +/- 0.441.min-1 vs 1.77 +/- 0.36) l.min-1). During CRP, the slope relating VO2 to power output computed from the three work loads was not statistically different between normoxia and hypoxia (delta VO2/delta w = 11.9 +/- 3.1 ml.min-1.W-1 vs 12.3 +/- 1.2 ml.min-1.W-1). These findings showed that during CRP, the metabolic efficiency (delta VO2/delta W) was the same in normoxia and in hypoxia. During CAP, the respiratory muscles O2 consumption might have accounted for the difference in VO2 consumption between hypoxia and normoxia.
在递增运动(IE)和恒定负荷运动期间,研究了急性低氧对摄氧量(VO₂)的影响。22名健康受试者在常氧(21% O₂)和低氧(10.4% O₂)条件下,在自行车测力计上进行了两次递增运动。15名受试者在相同的绝对功率(CAP)(116±33 W)下进行恒定负荷运动,而另外7名受试者在两种条件下,在相同的相对功率(CRP)(VO₂max的50%、60%和70%)下进行三次恒定负荷运动。当从总VO₂中减去呼吸肌耗氧量的估计值时,VO₂被定义为额外通气量。在递增运动期间,常氧下VO₂与工作率的线性回归斜率高于低氧(11.6±1.2 ml·l⁻¹·W⁻¹对10.1±1.1 ml·l⁻¹·W⁻¹,p<0.01)。在恒定绝对功率运动期间,常氧下的VO₂低于低氧(1.88±0.45 l·min⁻¹对1.96±0.42 l·min⁻¹,p<0.01),而额外通气量的VO₂无显著差异(1.80±0.44 l·min⁻¹对1.77±0.36 l·min⁻¹)。在恒定相对功率运动期间,常氧和低氧之间由三次工作负荷计算得出的VO₂与功率输出的斜率无统计学差异(VO₂变化量/功率变化量=11.9±3.1 ml·min⁻¹·W⁻¹对12.3±1.2 ml·min⁻¹·W⁻¹)。这些结果表明,在恒定相对功率运动期间,常氧和低氧下的代谢效率(VO₂变化量/功率变化量)相同。在恒定绝对功率运动期间,呼吸肌耗氧量可能是低氧和常氧下VO₂消耗差异的原因。