• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高刺激频率下对听神经的慢性电刺激:一项生理和组织病理学研究。

Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.

作者信息

Xu J, Shepherd R K, Millard R E, Clark G M

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Hear Res. 1997 Mar;105(1-2):1-29. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00193-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00193-1
PMID:9083801
Abstract

A major factor associated with recent improvements in the clinical performance of cochlear implant patients has been the development of speech-processing strategies based on high stimulation rates. While these processing strategies show clear clinical advantage, we know little of their long-term safety implications. The present study was designed to evaluate the physiological and histopathological effects of long-term intracochlear electrical stimulation using these high rates. Thirteen normal-hearing adult cats were bilaterally implanted with scala tympani electrode arrays and unilaterally stimulated for periods of up to 2100 h using either two pairs of bipolar or three monopolar stimulating electrodes. Stimuli consisted of short duration (25-50 microseconds/phase) charge-balanced biphasic current pulses presented at 1000 pulses per second (pps) per channel for monopolar stimulation, and 2000 pps/channel for bipolar stimulation. The electrodes were shorted between current pulses to minimize any residual direct current, and the pulse trains were presented using a 50% duty cycle (500 ms on; 500 ms off) in order to simulate speech. Both acoustic (ABR) and electrical (EABR) auditory brainstem responses were recorded periodically during the chronic stimulation program. All cochleas showed an increase in the click-evoked ABR threshold following implant surgery; however, recovery to near-normal levels occurred in approximately half of the stimulated cochleas 1 month post-operatively. The use of frequency-specific stimuli indicated that the most extensive hearing loss generally occurred in the high-frequency basal region of the cochlea (12 and 24 kHz) adjacent to the stimulating electrode. However, thresholds at lower frequencies (2, 4 and 8 kHz), appeared at near-normal levels despite long-term electrode implantation and electrical stimulation. Our longitudinal EABR results showed a statistically significant increase in threshold in nearly 40% of the chronically stimulated electrodes evaluated; however, the gradient of the EABR input/output (I/O) function (evoked potential response amplitude versus stimulus current) generally remained quite stable throughout the chronic stimulation period. Histopathological examination of the cochleas showed no statistically significant difference in ganglion cell densities between cochleas using monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations (P = 0.67), and no evidence of cochlear damage caused by high-rate electrical stimulation when compared with control cochleas. Indeed, there was no statistically significant relationship between spiral ganglion cell density and electrical stimulation (P = 0.459), or between the extent of loss of inner (IHC, P = 0.86) or outer (OHC, P = 0.30) hair cells and electrical stimulation. Spiral ganglion cell loss was, however, influenced by the degree of inflammation (P = 0.016) and electrode insertion trauma. These histopathological findings were consistent with the physiological data. Finally, electrode impedance, measured at completion of the chronic stimulation program, showed close correlation with the degree of tissue response adjacent to the electrode array. These results indicated that chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation, using carefully controlled charge-balanced biphasic current pulses at stimulus rates of up to 2000 pps/channel, does not appear to adversely affect residual auditory nerve elements or the cochlea in general. This study provides an important basis for the safe application of improved speech-processing strategies based on high-rate electrical stimulation.

摘要

与近期人工耳蜗植入患者临床效果改善相关的一个主要因素是基于高刺激率的言语处理策略的发展。虽然这些处理策略显示出明显的临床优势,但我们对其长期安全性影响知之甚少。本研究旨在评估使用这些高刺激率进行长期鼓阶内电刺激的生理和组织病理学效应。13只听力正常的成年猫双侧植入鼓阶电极阵列,并使用两对双极或三个单极刺激电极单侧刺激长达2100小时。刺激由短持续时间(25 - 50微秒/相位)的电荷平衡双相电流脉冲组成,单极刺激时每个通道以每秒1000脉冲(pps)呈现,双极刺激时每个通道以2000 pps呈现。电流脉冲之间电极短路以最小化任何残余直流电,并且脉冲序列以50%的占空比(开500毫秒;关500毫秒)呈现以模拟言语。在慢性刺激程序期间定期记录听觉脑干反应的声学(ABR)和电(EABR)反应。所有耳蜗在植入手术后点击诱发的ABR阈值均升高;然而,大约一半受刺激的耳蜗在术后1个月恢复到接近正常水平。使用频率特异性刺激表明,最广泛的听力损失通常发生在与刺激电极相邻的耳蜗高频基底区域(12和24千赫)。然而,尽管长期电极植入和电刺激,较低频率(2、4和8千赫)的阈值仍接近正常水平。我们的纵向EABR结果显示,在评估的近40%的慢性刺激电极中,阈值有统计学上的显著增加;然而,在整个慢性刺激期间,EABR输入/输出(I/O)函数(诱发电位反应幅度与刺激电流)的斜率通常保持相当稳定。耳蜗的组织病理学检查显示,使用单极和双极电极配置的耳蜗之间神经节细胞密度没有统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.67),并且与对照耳蜗相比,没有高速电刺激导致耳蜗损伤的证据。事实上,螺旋神经节细胞密度与电刺激之间没有统计学上的显著关系(P = 0.459),内毛细胞(IHC,P = 0.86)或外毛细胞(OHC,P = 0.30)损失程度与电刺激之间也没有统计学上的显著关系。然而,螺旋神经节细胞损失受炎症程度(P = 0.016)和电极插入创伤的影响。这些组织病理学发现与生理数据一致。最后,在慢性刺激程序完成时测量的电极阻抗与电极阵列相邻组织反应的程度密切相关。这些结果表明,使用精心控制的电荷平衡双相电流脉冲,以高达2000 pps/通道的刺激率进行慢性鼓阶内电刺激,似乎不会对残余听神经元件或整个耳蜗产生不利影响。本研究为基于高速电刺激的改进言语处理策略的安全应用提供了重要依据。

相似文献

1
Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.高刺激频率下对听神经的慢性电刺激:一项生理和组织病理学研究。
Hear Res. 1997 Mar;105(1-2):1-29. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00193-1.
2
Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.听觉神经慢性电刺激后的耳蜗病理学。I:听力正常的小猫。
Hear Res. 1992 Sep;62(1):63-81. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90203-y.
3
Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.听觉神经慢性电刺激后的耳蜗病理学:II. 致聋小猫
Hear Res. 1994 Dec;81(1-2):150-66. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90162-7.
4
Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.猫听觉神经的慢性电刺激。生理和组织病理学结果。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1983;399:19-31. doi: 10.3109/00016488309105589.
5
Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.慢性高频率电刺激对耳聋豚鼠耳蜗及听神经的影响。
Hear Res. 1997 Mar;105(1-2):30-43. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00202-x.
6
Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.聋猫的电耳蜗刺激:心理物理学阈值与中枢听觉神经元阈值的比较
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;83(4):2145-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2145.
7
Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.在高刺激频率下进行电刺激后,听神经兴奋性降低。
Hear Res. 1995 Aug;88(1-2):124-42. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00108-g.
8
Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using non-charge-balanced stimuli.使用非电荷平衡刺激对听神经进行慢性电刺激。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(6):674-84. doi: 10.1080/00016489950180621.
9
Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.听神经的电刺激:电极位置对神经兴奋的影响。
Hear Res. 1993 Mar;66(1):108-20. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90265-3.
10
Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?人工耳蜗植入和电刺激会影响残余毛细胞和螺旋神经节神经元吗?
Hear Res. 2007 Mar;225(1-2):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants reduce inflammation and foreign body response in human and murine cochleae.地塞米松洗脱型人工耳蜗可减轻人和小鼠耳蜗的炎症及异物反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30615. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10739-y.
2
Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.克服失败:提高植入式神经接口的接受度与成功率。
Bioelectron Med. 2025 Mar 14;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42234-025-00168-7.
3
Effects of Microstructured and Anti-Inflammatory-Coated Cochlear Implant Electrodes on Fibrous Tissue Growth and Neuronal Survival.
微结构和抗炎涂层人工耳蜗电极对纤维组织生长和神经元存活的影响。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 18;16(1):33. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010033.
4
Electrical Bioimpedance-Based Monitoring of Intracochlear Tissue Changes After Cochlear Implantation.基于电阻抗的人工耳蜗植入术后耳蜗内组织变化监测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;24(23):7570. doi: 10.3390/s24237570.
5
Stability of sputtered iridium oxide neural microelectrodes under kilohertz frequency pulsed stimulation.溅射氧化铱神经微电极在千赫兹频率脉冲刺激下的稳定性。
J Neural Eng. 2024 Nov 28;21(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad9404.
6
Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Effect of Early Activation on Electrode Impedance.人工耳蜗植入:早期开机对电极阻抗的长期影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3299. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113299.
7
Contribution of macrophages to neural survival and intracochlear tissue remodeling responses following cochlear implantation.巨噬细胞在耳蜗植入后对神经存活和内耳组织重塑反应的贡献。
J Neuroinflammation. 2023 Nov 16;20(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02955-y.
8
Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients.组织工程化耳蜗纤维化模型将复杂阻抗与耳蜗植入患者的纤维化形成联系起来。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Sep;12(24):e2300732. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300732. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Validation of Automatic Cochlear Measurements Using OTOPLAN Software.使用OTOPLAN软件对耳蜗自动测量进行验证。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 8;13(5):805. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050805.
10
Dual Drug Delivery in Cochlear Implants: In Vivo Study of Dexamethasone Combined with Diclofenac or Immunophilin Inhibitor MM284 in Guinea Pigs.人工耳蜗中的双药物递送:地塞米松与双氯芬酸或亲免素抑制剂MM284联合应用于豚鼠的体内研究
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 22;15(3):726. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030726.