Suppr超能文献

在高刺激频率下进行电刺激后,听神经兴奋性降低。

Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.

作者信息

Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Hear Res. 1995 Aug;88(1-2):124-42. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00108-g.

Abstract

While recent studies have suggested that electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates (e.g., 1000 pulses/s) may lead to an improved detection of the fine temporal components in speech among cochlear implant patients, neurophysiological studies have indicated that such stimulation could place metabolic stress on the auditory nerve, which may lead to neural degeneration. To examine this issue we recorded the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) of guinea pigs following acute bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation using charge-balanced biphasic current pulses at stimulus rates varying from 100 to 1000 pulses/s and stimulus intensities ranging from 0.16 to 1.0 microC/phase. Charge density was held constant (approximately 75 microC cm-2 geom/phase) in those experiments. To monitor the recovery in excitability of the auditory nerve following this acute stimulation. EABR thresholds, wave I and III amplitudes and their latencies were determined for periods of up to 12 h following the acute stimulation. Higher stimulus rates and, to a lesser extent, higher intensities led to greater decrements in the post-stimulus EABR amplitude and prolonged the recovery period. While continuous stimulation at 100 pulses/s induced no decrement in the EABR, stimulation at 200 and 400 pulses/s produced an increasingly significant post-stimulus reduction of the EABR amplitude, which showed only partial recovery during the monitoring period. No EABR response could be evoked immediately following stimulation at 1000 pulses/s, using a probe intensity 16-19 dB below the stimulus intensity. However, partial EABR recovery was observed for wave III following stimulation at the lowest stimulus intensity (0.16 microC/phase). These stimulus-induced reductions in the EABR amplitude were also reflected in increased thresholds and latencies. Providing stimulus rate and intensity were held constant, stimulation at different charge densities (37.7, 75.5 and 150.7 microC cm-2 geom/phase) had no influence on the post-stimulus EABR recovery. Significantly, the introduction of a 50% duty cycle into the stimulus pulse train resulted in a more rapid and complete post-stimulus recovery of the EABR compared to continuous stimulation. These data suggest that stimulus rate is a major contributor to the observed reduction in excitability of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. This reduction may be a result of an activity-induced depletion of neural energy resources required to maintain homeostasis. The present findings have implications for the design of safe speech-processing strategies for use in multichannel cochlear implants.

摘要

虽然最近的研究表明,以高刺激率(例如1000脉冲/秒)对听神经进行电刺激可能会改善人工耳蜗植入患者对语音中精细时间成分的检测,但神经生理学研究表明,这种刺激可能会给听神经带来代谢压力,这可能导致神经退化。为了研究这个问题,我们在豚鼠身上记录了急性双极鼓室内电刺激后的电诱发听性脑干反应(EABR),使用电荷平衡双相电流脉冲,刺激率从100到1000脉冲/秒不等,刺激强度从0.16到1.0微库仑/相。在这些实验中,电荷密度保持恒定(约75微库仑·厘米-2几何/相)。为了监测急性刺激后听神经兴奋性的恢复情况,在急性刺激后的长达12小时内测定EABR阈值、波I和波III的幅度及其潜伏期。较高的刺激率,以及在较小程度上较高的强度,会导致刺激后EABR幅度有更大的下降,并延长恢复时间。虽然以100脉冲/秒的频率持续刺激不会导致EABR下降,但以200和400脉冲/秒的频率刺激会导致刺激后EABR幅度越来越显著地下降,在监测期内仅显示部分恢复。以比刺激强度低16 - 19分贝的探测强度在1000脉冲/秒的频率刺激后,无法立即诱发EABR反应。然而,在最低刺激强度(0.16微库仑/相)刺激后,观察到波III有部分EABR恢复。这些刺激引起的EABR幅度下降也反映在阈值和潜伏期的增加上。只要刺激率和强度保持恒定,以不同电荷密度(37.7、75.5和150.7微库仑·厘米-2几何/相)进行刺激对刺激后EABR的恢复没有影响。值得注意的是,与持续刺激相比,在刺激脉冲序列中引入50%的占空比会使EABR在刺激后恢复得更快、更完全。这些数据表明,刺激率是观察到的电刺激听神经兴奋性降低的主要因素。这种降低可能是维持内环境稳定所需的神经能量资源因活动而耗尽的结果。目前的研究结果对用于多通道人工耳蜗的安全语音处理策略的设计具有启示意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验