Martin D J, Chen P S, Hwang C, Gang E S, Mandel W J, Peter C T, Swerdlow C D
Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Mar;8(3):241-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00786.x.
The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the shock strength at or above which ventricular fibrillation cannot be induced when delivered in the vulnerable period. It correlates acutely with the acute defibrillation threshold (DFT) and can be determined with a single episode of fibrillation. The goal of this prospective study was to determine the relationship between the ULV and the chronic DFT.
We studied 40 patients at, and 3 months after, implantation of transvenous cardioverter defibrillators. The ULV was defined as the weakest biphasic shock that failed to induce fibrillation when delivered 0, 20, and 40 msec before the peak of the T wave. patients were classified as clinically stable or unstable based on prospectively defined criteria. There were no significant differences between the group means for the acute and chronic determinations of ULV (13.5 +/- 5.3 J vs 12.4 +/- 6.8 J, P = 0.25) and DFT (10.1 +/- 5.0 J vs 9.9 +/- 5.7 J, P = 0.74). Five patients (15%) were classified as unstable. The strength of the correlation between acute ULV and acute DFT (r = 0.74, P < 0.001) was similar to that between the chronic ULV and chronic DFT (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). There was a correlation between the change in ULV from acute to chronic and the corresponding change in DFT (r = 0.67, P < 0.001). The chronic DFT was less than the acute ULV +3 J in all 35 stable patients, but it was greater in 2 of 5 unstable patients (P = 0.04).
The strength of the correlation between the chronic ULV and the chronic DFT is comparable to that between the acute ULV and the acute DFT. Temporal changes in the ULV predict temporal changes in the DFT. In clinically stable patients, a defibrillation safety margin of 3 J above the acute ULV proved an adequate chronic safety margin.
易损性上限(ULV)是指在易损期发放电击时,能诱发室颤的最低电击强度。它与急性除颤阈值(DFT)密切相关,且可通过单次室颤发作来确定。本前瞻性研究的目的是确定ULV与慢性DFT之间的关系。
我们对40例植入经静脉心脏转复除颤器的患者在植入时及植入后3个月进行了研究。ULV定义为在T波峰值前0、20和40毫秒发放电击时未能诱发室颤的最弱双相电击强度。根据前瞻性定义的标准将患者分为临床稳定或不稳定。急性和慢性ULV测定的组均值之间(13.5±5.3焦耳对12.4±6.8焦耳,P = 0.25)以及DFT测定的组均值之间(10.1±5.0焦耳对9.9±5.7焦耳,P = 0.74)均无显著差异。5例患者(15%)被分类为不稳定。急性ULV与急性DFT之间的相关性强度(r = 0.74,P < 0.001)与慢性ULV和慢性DFT之间的相关性强度相似(r = 0.82,P < 0.001)。从急性到慢性ULV的变化与相应的DFT变化之间存在相关性(r = 0.67,P < 0.001)。在所有35例稳定患者中,慢性DFT均小于急性ULV +3焦耳,但在5例不稳定患者中有2例慢性DFT大于此值(P = 0.04)。
慢性ULV与慢性DFT之间的相关性强度与急性ULV和急性DFT之间的相关性强度相当。ULV的时间变化可预测DFT的时间变化。在临床稳定的患者中,比急性ULV高3焦耳的除颤安全裕度被证明是足够的慢性安全裕度。