Eaton K A, Rimini F M, Zak E, Brookman D J, Hopkins L M, Cannell P J, Yates L G, Morrice C A, Lall B A, Newman H N
Department of Periodontology. Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Mar;24(3):189-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00490.x.
Several previous studies have evaluated the effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (ChD) mouthrinses on plaque and gingival inflammation. However, previously, none have been based in general dental practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential to conduct controlled periodontal clinical trials in co-operation with general dental practitioners (gdps). The project took place in 5 general dental practices in the South of England. 121 healthy subjects (24 at 4 sites and 25 at the 5th), aged 18-65 years, mean 35 +/- 12) years participated in a double-blind, randomised study during which they received full mouth assessments for plaque and gingival bleeding at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. 60 subjects were randomly assigned to use the 0.12% ChD mouthwash and 61 the placebo. The assessments were carried out by 5 gpds, who had previously achieved inter-examiner kappa scores of 0.78-0.85 (mean 0.81) for the plaque index (PII), and of 0.73-0.94 (mean 0.87) for a modified gingival index (mGI), and who maintained kappa scores of 0.51-0.90 for PII and of 0.73-1.00 for mGI during the 12 months required to complete the study. 98 subjects (48 ChD and 50 placebo) completed the study. Even though the baseline levels of plaque and gingivitis were low, by week 12, mean whole mouth plaque score of the ChD mouthwash users had fallen from 1.33 at baseline to 0.96 and was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than for the placebo users, 1.31 at baseline to 1.13. Whole-mouth gingival bleeding score fell from 0.56 to 0.42 in the ChD mouthwash group but was unchanged (0.54-0.55) in the placebo group. A subsidiary data analysis which considered the effects at sites indicated that within these overall differences, the ChD users experienced almost 2 x the reduction from plaque score 2 at baseline at proximal molar sites over a 12-week period (50.6% ChD versus 27.6% placebo). It was concluded that 0.12% ChD mouthwash reduced plaque accumulation by 28% and gingival inflammation by 25% over a 12-week period, that it is feasible for a group of gdps to maintain high levels of inter-examiner consistency in the use of PII and mGI, that it is also feasible to carry out such a multicentre study in general dental practice, and that the use of mean mouth scores per subject to analyse the effects of mouthrinses may well mask variations in response throughout the mouth.
此前已有多项研究评估了0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定(ChD)漱口水对牙菌斑和牙龈炎症的影响。然而,此前尚无研究以普通牙科诊所为基础。本研究的目的是评估与普通牙科医生(GDPs)合作开展对照牙周临床试验的可能性。该项目在英格兰南部的5家普通牙科诊所进行。121名健康受试者(4个地点各24名,第5个地点25名),年龄在18 - 65岁之间,平均年龄35±12岁,参与了一项双盲随机研究,在此期间他们在基线、第6周和第12周接受了全口牙菌斑和牙龈出血评估。60名受试者被随机分配使用0.12% ChD漱口水,61名使用安慰剂。评估由5名GDPs进行,他们此前在菌斑指数(PII)方面的检查者间kappa评分在0.78 - 0.85之间(平均0.81),在改良牙龈指数(mGI)方面的评分在0.73 - 0.94之间(平均0.87),并且在完成研究所需的12个月期间,PII的kappa评分保持在0.51 - 0.90之间,mGI的评分保持在0.73 - 1.00之间。98名受试者(48名ChD组和50名安慰剂组)完成了研究。尽管基线时的牙菌斑和牙龈炎水平较低,但到第12周时,使用ChD漱口水的受试者全口平均菌斑评分从基线时的1.33降至0.96,显著低于(p < 0.001)使用安慰剂的受试者,后者从基线时的1.31降至1.13。ChD漱口水组的全口牙龈出血评分从0.56降至0.42,而安慰剂组则无变化(0.54 - 0.55)。一项考虑各部位影响的辅助数据分析表明,在这些总体差异范围内,使用ChD漱口水的受试者在12周内近端磨牙部位的菌斑评分从基线时的2降低了近2倍(ChD组为50.6%,安慰剂组为27.6%)。得出的结论是,0.12% ChD漱口水在12周内使牙菌斑积聚减少了28%,牙龈炎症减少了25%;一组GDPs在使用PII和mGI时保持高水平的检查者间一致性是可行的;在普通牙科诊所开展这样的多中心研究也是可行的;使用每个受试者的平均口腔评分来分析漱口水的效果很可能掩盖了整个口腔内反应的差异。