Suppr超能文献

前瞻性获得的假定肠致病性大肠杆菌血清群中的毒力标志物。

Markers of virulence among prospectively acquired putative enteropathogenic Escherichia coli serogroups.

作者信息

Cimolai N, Cheong A C, Trombley C

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):267-74.

PMID:9086533
Abstract

We assessed the frequency of proposed enteropathogenic virulence factor genes (eaeA and eaf) by genetic amplification for a series of prospectively collected putative enteropathogenic Escherichia coli serogroup isolates that were acquired from the stool specimens of children. Among 102 isolates, eaeA and eaf markers were determined among 27.5% and 4.9%, respectively. Eaf positivity was found to be coexisting in only a minority of eaeA+ E. coli; the eaeA+/eaf- genotype was most common among strains that had evidence of at least one virulence marker. When clinical variables were compared for two groups of patients whose strains did or did not possess eaeA, the eaeA+ group was more likely to have had an acute diarrheal illness (P = .05) and less likely to have had an underlying chronic illness (P = .03). Localized adherence in vitro was easily recognized for eaeA+/eaf+ E. coli but eaeA+/eaf- isolates were less consistent in manifesting this phenotype. The availability of genetic amplification technologies has the potential to rekindle diagnostic interests in this area, although a rational approach has yet to be defined.

摘要

我们通过基因扩增评估了一系列前瞻性收集的、从儿童粪便标本中获得的疑似肠致病性大肠杆菌血清群分离株中肠致病性毒力因子基因(eaeA和eaf)的出现频率。在102株分离株中,eaeA和eaf标记物的检出率分别为27.5%和4.9%。仅在少数eaeA阳性的大肠杆菌中发现eaf阳性;eaeA+/eaf-基因型在至少有一个毒力标记物证据的菌株中最为常见。当对两组菌株分别具有或不具有eaeA的患者的临床变量进行比较时,eaeA阳性组更有可能患有急性腹泻病(P = 0.05),而患有潜在慢性病的可能性较小(P = 0.03)。对于eaeA+/eaf+大肠杆菌,体外局部黏附很容易识别,但eaeA+/eaf-分离株在表现出这种表型方面不太一致。尽管尚未确定合理的方法,但基因扩增技术的可用性有可能重新激发该领域的诊断兴趣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验