50年前：纽伦堡医生审判。第四部分：纳粹医学在当今的影响。
50 years ago: the Nuremberg Doctors' Tribunal. Part 4: Nazi medicine's relevance today.
作者信息
Ernst E
机构信息
Department of Complementary Medicine, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(3):70-1.
PMID:9086587
Abstract
The final part of this series attempts to evaluate the relevance of Nazi medicine for doctors today. Euthanasia, informed consent, the conflict of interests of the individual versus those of society and racism were as prominent themes of Nazi medicine as they are today. It would be foolish not to learn from experiences of the past. Nazi medicine can therefore never be an irrelevant subject of the days gone by.
摘要
本系列的最后一部分试图评估纳粹医学对当今医生的相关性。安乐死、知情同意、个人利益与社会利益的冲突以及种族主义在纳粹医学中是突出主题，如今亦是如此。不借鉴过去的经验是愚蠢的。因此，纳粹医学绝不可能是过去无关紧要的话题。
相似文献
1
50 years ago: the Nuremberg Doctors' Tribunal. Part 4: Nazi medicine's relevance today.50年前：纽伦堡医生审判。第四部分：纳粹医学在当今的影响。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(3):70-1.
2
50 years ago: the Nuremberg Doctors' Tribunal. Part 3: The failure of coming to terms with the past.50年前：纽伦堡医生审判。第三部分：与过去和解的失败。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(2):53-4.
3
50 years ago: the Nuremberg Doctors' Tribunal. Part 1: The descent towards medicalised murder.50年前：纽伦堡医生审判。第一部分：迈向医学谋杀的堕落之路。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1996;146(21-22):574-6.
4
50 years ago: the Nuremberg doctors' tribunal. Part 2: Medical resistance during the Third Reich.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1996;146(24):629-31.
5
Upon finding a Nazi anatomy atlas: the lessons of Nazi medicine.发现一本纳粹解剖学图谱：纳粹医学的教训
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1996 Fall;59(4):18-22.
6
Medical films, ethics and euthanasia in Nazi Germany: the history of medical research and teaching films of the Reich Office for Educational Films, Reich Institute for Films in Science and Education, 1933-1945.纳粹德国的医学影片、伦理与安乐死：帝国教育电影办公室、帝国科学与教育电影研究所的医学研究与教学影片史，1933 - 1945年
Abh Gesch Med Naturwiss. 2002(92):1-394.
7
Mengele medicus: medicine's Nazi heritage.门格勒医生：医学的纳粹遗产。
Milbank Q. 1988;66(2):221-39.
8
When Medicine Went Mad, edited by Arthur L. Caplan.《当医学发疯时》，亚瑟·L·卡普兰编著。
J Leg Med. 1993 Jun;14(2):349-54. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510919.
9
Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.五十年后：《纽伦堡法典》的意义
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1436-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711133372006.
10
It never dies: assessing the Nazi analogy in bioethics.它永不消逝：评估生物伦理学中的纳粹类比。
J Med Humanit. 1992 Spring;13(1):21-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Improving diversity in study participation: Patient perspectives on barriers, racial differences and the role of communities.提高研究参与多样性：患者对障碍、种族差异和社区作用的看法。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1979-1987. doi: 10.1111/hex.13554. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Physician-Assisted Dying: Acceptance by Physicians Only for Patients Close to Death.医师协助自杀：仅接受临近死亡的患者。
Pain Ther. 2014 Dec;3(2):103-12. doi: 10.1007/s40122-014-0029-z. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Zotero 插件