Unrug A, Bener J, Barry R J, van Luijtelaar E L, Coenen A M, Kaiser J
Department of Psychophysiology, Jagiellonian University, Golebia, Poland.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Feb;25(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00744-1.
The influence of two anxiolytics on basal heart rate and on the evoked cardiac response elicited by auditory stimuli, was studied in humans. Diazepam (Valium) (7.5 mg) and buspirone (Buspar) (7.5 mg), which differ in their psycho-pharmacological profiles, were used. Prestimulus vigilance and cognitive load were manipulated by instructions allowing the subjects to ignore the stimuli, or requiring them to count the tones. Drug effects were obtained in subjective alertness, basal heart rate level, and the evoked cardiac response. Diazepam reduced subjective alertness, while buspirone did not. Diazepam apparently increased heart rate levels relative to placebo, in contrast to buspirone, which produced an apparent decrease in heart rate. These drug-induced prestimulus heart rate level effects were associated with differential decelerations immediately following stimulus onset and appear to reflect differences in prestimulus vigilance. Opposite effects of the drugs were also observed in the second, acceleratory, component of the of the evoked cardiac response, and these were found to be independent of the prestimulus drug effects. Compared with placebo, buspirone appeared to enhance the acceleratory component in the count condition, while diazepam led to an apparent reduction of this component. Enhancement of this acceleration after buspirone may reflect an increase in cognitive effort directed to the performance of task-relevant behaviour, while the reduction of this component after diazepam can be regarded as a cognitive-motivational neutralisation of signal value. The differential effects of the two anxiolytics support the separation of the evoked cardiac response into different components and may also have implications for the clinical use of the drugs.
在人类中研究了两种抗焦虑药对基础心率以及听觉刺激诱发的心脏反应的影响。使用了心理药理学特征不同的地西泮(安定)(7.5毫克)和丁螺环酮(布斯帕)(7.5毫克)。通过让受试者忽略刺激或要求他们数音调的指示来操纵刺激前的警觉性和认知负荷。在主观警觉性、基础心率水平和诱发的心脏反应方面获得了药物效果。地西泮降低了主观警觉性,而丁螺环酮没有。与丁螺环酮相比,地西泮相对于安慰剂明显提高了心率水平,丁螺环酮则使心率明显下降。这些药物诱发的刺激前心率水平效应与刺激开始后立即出现的不同减速有关,似乎反映了刺激前警觉性的差异。在诱发心脏反应的第二个加速成分中也观察到了药物的相反作用,并且发现这些作用与刺激前的药物效果无关。与安慰剂相比,丁螺环酮在计数条件下似乎增强了加速成分,而地西泮则导致该成分明显降低。丁螺环酮后这种加速的增强可能反映了针对与任务相关行为表现的认知努力增加,而地西泮后该成分的降低可被视为信号价值的认知-动机中和。两种抗焦虑药的不同作用支持将诱发的心脏反应分为不同成分,也可能对药物的临床应用有影响。