Nordan L T
Total Eye Care Center, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1997 Winter;37(1):51-63. doi: 10.1097/00004397-199703710-00005.
At a minimum, the refractive surgeon should use the patient's history, refraction, keratometry, and slit-lamp examination to determine the status of a patient's cornea. A diagnosis of keratoconus easily can explain a patient's symptoms or greatly alter a plan of action for refractive surgery. If the surgeon finds automated topography useful as a screening device for keratoconus, for patient education, and for the documentation of corneal status, it also should be included in the patient's examination. Indeed, most cases of keratoconus will be demonstrated by automated topography. However, the surgeon must resist the notion that automated topography replaces manual keratometry. The two modalities should be additive to provide increased information about the patient's cornea and should not be considered in competition with each other, as implied by some. The most important information obtained from automated topography is the determination of the optical quality of the cornea. This information greatly affects the choice of refractive surgery and explains postoperative problems. Far too much attention has been paid to the exact dioptric power at different corneal sites indicated by automated topography. Indeed, current automated topography techniques can only estimate the dioptric values of an aspherical cornea several millimeters from the center of the cornea. Refraction is the most accurate means for determining the refractive status of the eye. Refractive surgery is designed to correct a refractive error; it is not a topographical map. Those topography units that afford the observer the most accurate information about corneal irregular astigmatism will become very valuable. Because irregular astigmatism is linked directly to keratoconus, the more sensitive an automated topography system is in detecting irregular astigmatism, the better will it detect the subtle levels of keratoconus. Above all, the astute corneal diagnostician must learn to appreciate irregular astigmatism and should train extensively with a manual keratometer to detect subtle yet very meaningful levels of preoperative keratoconus and irregular astigmatism following refractive surgery.
至少,屈光手术医生应利用患者的病史、验光、角膜曲率测量和裂隙灯检查来确定患者角膜的状况。圆锥角膜的诊断很容易解释患者的症状,或极大地改变屈光手术的行动计划。如果医生发现自动角膜地形图作为圆锥角膜的筛查工具、用于患者教育以及记录角膜状况很有用,那么它也应包含在患者的检查中。实际上,大多数圆锥角膜病例都可通过自动角膜地形图显示出来。然而,医生必须抵制自动角膜地形图取代手动角膜曲率测量的观念。这两种方法应相辅相成,以提供更多关于患者角膜的信息,而不应像有些人暗示的那样被视为相互竞争。从自动角膜地形图获得的最重要信息是角膜光学质量的测定。该信息极大地影响屈光手术的选择,并能解释术后问题。人们过于关注自动角膜地形图所显示的角膜不同部位的确切屈光度。实际上,当前的自动角膜地形图技术只能估计距角膜中心几毫米处非球面角膜的屈光度值。验光仍是确定眼睛屈光状态最准确的方法。屈光手术旨在矫正屈光不正,而不是绘制地形图。那些能为观察者提供关于角膜不规则散光最准确信息的地形图设备将变得非常有价值。由于不规则散光与圆锥角膜直接相关,自动角膜地形图系统检测不规则散光越敏感,就越能更好地检测出圆锥角膜的细微程度。最重要的是,敏锐的角膜诊断医生必须学会识别不规则散光,并应使用手动角膜曲率计进行大量训练,以检测术前圆锥角膜的细微但非常有意义的程度以及屈光手术后的不规则散光。