Frommer D
Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Jan;40(1):100-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02055690.
This study was undertaken to determine whether different regimens using sodium phosphate (NaPh) solutions resulted in better bowel cleansing than polyethylene glycol-salt (PEG) solutions and, if so, why. Side-effects and patient acceptability of the different regimens were also investigated.
A total of 486 patients requiring colonoscopy were randomly assigned to one of three preparations in a single-blind prospective study. The preparations were as follows: Group A, 3 liters of PEG solution taken at 2 p.m. the day before examination; Group B, 45 ml of NaPh solutions taken at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. the day before examination; or Group C, 45 ml of NaPh taken at 6 p.m. the day before and at 6 a.m. on the morning of, examination. Cleanliness of the bowel was assessed blindly, and patients were questioned about side-effects and preferences for NaPh vs. PEG.
Numbers, ages, and gender distribution of patients in the three groups did not differ significantly from each other. Cleanliness scores for the three groups were 3.34 +/- 0.97, 3.22 +/- 0.85, and 4.11 +/- 0.67 (Group C vs. Groups A and B, P < 0.0005; Group A vs. Group B, P > 0.30). Predominance of material in the right side of the colon was found in 13.7, 29.8, and 4.2 percent of Groups A, B, and C, respectively. In the three groups, nausea alone occurred in 3.8, 13.7, and 16.3 percent of patients; vomiting occurred in 0.6, 7.4, and 5.4 percent of patients; and dryness/thirst occurred in 1.9, 17.4, and 20.4 percent of patients, respectively. A total of 80.6 and 82.6 percent of those in Groups B and C who had previously had PEG expressed a preference for taking NaPh (P < 0.001).
The regimen of Group C is significantly better than the regimens of Groups A or B in bowel cleansing. Regimens of Groups A and B did not differ in efficacy of cleansing. It is the timing of taking NaPh in the regimen of Group C rather than its composition that is responsible for its superior cleansing ability compared with PEG. Overnight deposition of small intestinal material in the right colon is partly responsible for the inferior cleansing ability of regimens that involve taking the solution on the day before colonoscopy. Despite a higher incidence of minor side-effects from NaPh than from PEG, a significantly higher proportion of patients preferred NaPh.
本研究旨在确定使用磷酸钠(NaPh)溶液的不同方案是否比聚乙二醇盐(PEG)溶液能带来更好的肠道清洁效果,若如此,原因何在。同时还研究了不同方案的副作用及患者可接受性。
在一项单盲前瞻性研究中,将总共486例需要进行结肠镜检查的患者随机分配至三种准备方案之一。方案如下:A组,在检查前一天下午2点服用3升PEG溶液;B组,在检查前一天上午7点和晚上7点各服用45毫升NaPh溶液;或C组,在检查前一天下午6点和检查当天上午6点各服用45毫升NaPh溶液。由专人对肠道清洁情况进行评估,并询问患者关于副作用以及对NaPh和PEG的偏好。
三组患者的数量、年龄和性别分布彼此间无显著差异。三组的清洁评分分别为3.34±0.97、3.22±0.85和4.11±0.67(C组与A组和B组相比,P<0.0005;A组与B组相比,P>0.30)。结肠右侧有较多残留物质的情况在A组、B组和C组中分别占13.7%、29.8%和4.2%。在三组中,仅出现恶心症状的患者分别占3.8%、13.7%和16.3%;出现呕吐症状的患者分别占0.6%、7.4%和5.4%;出现口干/口渴症状的患者分别占1.9%、17.4%和20.4%。B组和C组中曾服用过PEG的患者,分别有80.6%和82.6%表示更倾向于服用NaPh(P<0.001)。
C组方案在肠道清洁方面明显优于A组或B组方案。A组和B组方案的清洁效果无差异。与PEG相比,C组方案中NaPh的服用时间而非其成分决定了其卓越的清洁能力。小肠内容物在前一晚沉积于右半结肠,这在一定程度上导致了在结肠镜检查前一天服用溶液的方案清洁能力较差。尽管NaPh引起的轻微副作用发生率高于PEG,但明显有更高比例的患者更喜欢NaPh。