Lee Jae Min, Lee Jae Hyung, Kim Eun Sun, Lee Jung Min, Yoo In Kyung, Kim Seung Han, Choi Hyuk Soon, Keum Bora, Seo Yeon Seok, Jeen Yoon Tae, Lee Hong Sik, Chun Hoon Jai, Um Soon Ho, Kim Chang Duck
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(51):e9011. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009011.
The safety of bowel-cleansing agents is an important issue in clinical practice, especially in patients with chronic diseases. Although the safety and efficacy of polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been investigated in many studies, few studies on PEG plus ascorbic acid exist. In this study, we compared the safety of 2 bowel-cleansing agents for patients with liver cirrhosis: 2-liter PEG (2 L PEG) plus ascorbic acid versus 4-liter PEG (4 L PEG). We performed a retrospective study on colonoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Patients referred for colonoscopy were divided into 2 groups: 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid (n = 105) and 4 L PEG (n = 61). Safety was assessed by comparing the clinical factors and laboratory findings as follows: blood biochemistry, electrolytes, weight change, and bowel-cleansing quality. Serum electrolytes, laboratory findings, and body weight showed no significant change between the 2 groups. There was no significant change in clinical factors before and after bowel preparation in the PEG group or the PEG plus ascorbic acid group. The acceptability and compliance of patients was better in the 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid than the 4 L PEG group. In subgroup analysis, patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis showed no increased risk of electrolyte imbalances after bowel preparation. Child-Pugh scores did not influence the outcome after bowel cleansing. Successful cleansing was mostly achieved in both groups. Our analysis showed that of the use of 2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid could be a safe choice for colonoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis.
肠道清洁剂的安全性是临床实践中的一个重要问题,尤其是在患有慢性疾病的患者中。尽管许多研究已经对聚乙二醇(PEG)的安全性和有效性进行了调查,但关于PEG加抗坏血酸的研究却很少。在本研究中,我们比较了两种肠道清洁剂对肝硬化患者的安全性:2升PEG(2L PEG)加抗坏血酸与4升PEG(4L PEG)。我们对肝硬化患者的结肠镜检查进行了一项回顾性研究。接受结肠镜检查的患者被分为两组:2L PEG加抗坏血酸组(n = 105)和4L PEG组(n = 61)。通过比较以下临床因素和实验室检查结果来评估安全性:血液生化、电解质、体重变化和肠道清洁质量。两组之间血清电解质、实验室检查结果和体重均无显著变化。PEG组或PEG加抗坏血酸组肠道准备前后临床因素均无显著变化。2L PEG加抗坏血酸组患者的可接受性和依从性优于4L PEG组。在亚组分析中,代偿期或失代偿期肝硬化患者肠道准备后电解质失衡风险未增加。Child-Pugh评分不影响肠道清洁后的结果。两组大多都成功完成了肠道清洁。我们的分析表明,对于肝硬化患者行结肠镜检查,使用2L PEG加抗坏血酸可能是一种安全的选择。