de Miranda Neto Antonio Afonso, de Moura Diogo Turiani Hourneaux, Hathorn Kelly E, Tustumi Francisco, de Moura Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux, Ribeiro Igor Braga
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Gasteoenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy - Brigham and Women´s Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;13:449-457. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S237649. eCollection 2020.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam for evaluation of colonic abnormalities and for screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy of colonoscopy is dependent on the quality of the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) have emerged as two of the most commonly used bowel preparation agents. We conducted an evidence-based review of current evidence to further investigate the efficacy and patient tolerability of split-dose SPMC oral solution compared to PEG solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation.
A systematic search was performed using Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All studies on split-dose bowel preparation with SPMC and PEG were reviewed. Relevant studies regarding colonoscopy and bowel preparations were also included. Randomized controlled trials were prioritized due to the high quality of evidence.
Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Split-dose SPMC and PEG were associated with similar results for adequacy of bowel preparation. Split-dose SPMC was associated with increased patient tolerability and compliance.
Split-dose SPMC and PEG are both adequate and safe for bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy, with split-dose SPMC being more tolerable for patients. Additional RCTs comparing these and other bowel preparation solutions are necessary to further investigate quality of bowel preparation, patient preference, and cost-effectiveness of the various options.
结肠镜检查是评估结肠异常以及筛查和监测结直肠癌的金标准检查。然而,结肠镜检查的效果取决于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的质量。聚乙二醇(PEG)和匹可硫酸钠/枸橼酸镁(SPMC)已成为两种最常用的肠道准备剂。我们对当前证据进行了循证综述,以进一步研究与PEG溶液相比,分剂量SPMC口服溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效和患者耐受性。
使用PubMed(MEDLINE)、科学网、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库进行系统检索。对所有关于分剂量使用SPMC和PEG进行肠道准备的研究进行了综述。还纳入了有关结肠镜检查和肠道准备的相关研究。由于证据质量高,优先考虑随机对照试验。
纳入了八项随机对照试验。分剂量SPMC和PEG在肠道准备充分性方面的结果相似。分剂量SPMC与患者耐受性和依从性的提高有关。
分剂量SPMC和PEG用于门诊结肠镜检查的肠道准备都是充分且安全的,分剂量SPMC对患者更具耐受性。有必要进行更多比较这些及其他肠道准备溶液的随机对照试验,以进一步研究肠道准备质量、患者偏好以及各种选择的成本效益。