Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Final mammography recommendation?
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1181.
2
NIH consensus panel spurs discontent.
JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):519-20.
3
Screening mammography for women in their forties: the Panel of Babel.
J Womens Health. 1997 Feb;6(1):1-3. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1997.6.1.
4
Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1103-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1103.
5
Correlation is not causation.
Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):832-3; discussion 834-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.832.
6
Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1180-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361612.
7
Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. National Institutes of Health.
JAMA. 1997 Dec 17;278(23):2105-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.23.2105.
8
The mammography muddle.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 May;168(5):1151. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129402.
9
The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):4-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja504.
10
Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101109.
Zotero 插件