• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西替利嗪和氯雷他定对变应性鼻炎患者鼻内抗组胺作用的起效时间。

Onset of action in the nasal antihistaminic effect of cetirizine and loratadine in patients with allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Frossard N, Lacronique J, Melac M, Benabdesselam O, Braun J J, Glasser N, Pauli G

机构信息

INSERM U 425, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Allergy. 1997 Feb;52(2):205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00976.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00976.x
PMID:9105526
Abstract

Several studies have compared the cutaneous efficacy of cetirizine and loratadine and their onset of action. We assessed the nasal effect of these two antihistamines in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial in order to compare objectively their efficacy and onset of action in the noses of patients with allergic rhinitis. Nasal challenge was performed by nebulization of increasing doubling doses of histamine (0, 0.04-1.28 mg/nostril) in 12 patients (eight men, four women, aged 22-39 years). Nasal airway resistance (NAR) was measured by posterior rhinomanometry either 1.5 h or 4 h after intake of cetirizine (10 mg), loratadine (10 mg), or placebo. Baseline NAR was identical between all study days (2.60-2.88 cmH2O.l-1.s). One and a half hours after intake, the increase in NAR induced by histamine was significantly reduced by both cetirizine and loratadine in contrast to placebo. However, with cetirizine the nasal obstruction was significantly lower than with loratadine (P < 0.05). Four hours after intake, a similar inhibition of the nasal obstruction caused by histamine was observed with both cetirizine and loratadine (P < 0.05). In conclusion, this study found cetirizine and loratadine to have similar nasal efficacy at therapeutic dosage 4 h after intake, whereas cetirizine was more effective than loratadine 1.5 h after intake. In agreement with the results observed in the skin, our study suggests a more rapid onset of action of cetirizine in the nose in allergic rhinitis.

摘要

多项研究比较了西替利嗪和氯雷他定的皮肤疗效及其起效时间。我们在一项随机、双盲、交叉、安慰剂对照试验中评估了这两种抗组胺药的鼻部效果,以便客观比较它们在过敏性鼻炎患者鼻部的疗效和起效时间。对12名患者(8名男性,4名女性,年龄22 - 39岁)进行组胺雾化激发试验,组胺剂量以加倍递增(每侧鼻孔0、0.04 - 1.28 mg)。在服用西替利嗪(10 mg)、氯雷他定(10 mg)或安慰剂后1.5小时或4小时,通过后鼻测压法测量鼻气道阻力(NAR)。所有研究日的基线NAR相同(2.60 - 2.88 cmH₂O·l⁻¹·s)。服药后1.5小时,与安慰剂相比,西替利嗪和氯雷他定都能显著降低组胺诱导的NAR升高。然而,西替利嗪引起的鼻塞明显低于氯雷他定(P < 0.05)。服药后4小时,西替利嗪和氯雷他定对组胺引起的鼻塞均有类似的抑制作用(P < 0.05)。总之,本研究发现服用4小时后,西替利嗪和氯雷他定在鼻部的疗效相似,而服药后1.5小时,西替利嗪比氯雷他定更有效。与在皮肤中观察到的结果一致,我们的研究表明在过敏性鼻炎患者中,西替利嗪在鼻部起效更快。

相似文献

1
Onset of action in the nasal antihistaminic effect of cetirizine and loratadine in patients with allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪和氯雷他定对变应性鼻炎患者鼻内抗组胺作用的起效时间。
Allergy. 1997 Feb;52(2):205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00976.x.
2
Nasal effect of cetirizine and loratadine at 24 hours in patients with allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪和氯雷他定对变应性鼻炎患者24小时的鼻部作用
Am J Ther. 1998 Sep;5(5):307-11. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199809000-00006.
3
Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal obstruction by cetirizine in allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪对变应性鼻炎中组胺诱导的鼻阻塞的抑制作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992 Apr;33(4):445-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04065.x.
4
Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine.氯雷他定和西替利嗪治疗患者的鼻激发试验与皮肤试验比较
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Apr;103(4):591-4. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70229-0.
5
Efficacy of ebastine, cetirizine, and loratadine in histamine cutaneous challenges.依巴斯汀、西替利嗪和氯雷他定在组胺皮肤激发试验中的疗效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Sep;89(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61952-7.
6
Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂用于季节性变应性鼻炎患者:在环境暴露舱中进行豚草花粉激发试验后的效果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1.
7
Loratadine treatment of rhinitis due to pollen allergy reduces epithelial ICAM-1 expression.氯雷他定治疗花粉过敏引起的鼻炎可降低上皮细胞细胞间黏附分子-1的表达。
Clin Exp Allergy. 1997 Oct;27(10):1175-83.
8
Clinical pharmacology of the H1-receptor antagonists cetirizine and loratadine in children.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2000 May;11(2):116-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2000.00045.x.
9
Comparative onset of action and symptom relief with cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in an environmental exposure unit in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: confirmation of a test system.在季节性变应性鼻炎患者的环境暴露单元中,比较西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂的起效时间和症状缓解情况:验证一个测试系统。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Dec;87(6):474-81. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62260-0.
10
Reduction of soluble ICAM-1 levels in nasal secretion by H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis.H1 受体阻滞剂降低季节性变应性鼻炎患者鼻分泌物中可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1水平
Allergy. 1997 Oct;52(10):1022-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02425.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.地氯雷他定、非索非那定和左西替利嗪的临床药代动力学与药效学:一项比较性综述
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(4):217-30. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847040-00001.
2
Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.第二代抗组胺药:在过敏性疾病管理中的作用与疗效
Drugs. 2005;65(3):341-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00004.
3
Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.
西替利嗪和咪唑斯汀在24小时对组胺诱导的皮肤风团和潮红反应的比较活性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;53(3):250-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01551.x.
4
Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: superior relief?用于过敏性鼻炎的鼻内皮质类固醇:缓解效果更佳?
Drugs. 2001;61(11):1563-79. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161110-00004.