Suppr超能文献

探寻创伤后应激障碍中情绪性斯特鲁普干扰效应的根源:对创伤性词汇的P3研究

Seeking the source of emotional Stroop interference effects in PTSD: a study of P3s to traumatic words.

作者信息

Metzger L J, Orr S P, Lasko N B, McNally R J, Pitman R K

机构信息

VA Medical Center, Manchester, N.H., USA.

出版信息

Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1997 Jan-Mar;32(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02688612.

Abstract

We investigated the source of emotional Stroop interference effects in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by measuring reaction times and P3 latencies and amplitudes to personal traumatic, personal positive, and neutral words in a modified Stroop paradigm. Individuals with PTSD were slower to indicate word color, especially for traumatic words, thereby replicating emotional Stroop interference in PTSD. Individuals with PTSD also had significantly reduced and delayed P3 components across word types. Across diagnostic groups, frontal P3 amplitudes were larger to personal positive and traumatic words compared to standard neutral words. However, the absence of Diagnosis x Word Type interactions for P3 measures suggests that individuals with PTSD do not differ from individuals without PTSD in the encoding and recognition of the color of traumatic relative to nontraumatic words, and that Stroop interference does not occur during these early stages of processing.

摘要

我们通过在改良的斯特鲁普范式中测量对个人创伤性、个人积极和中性词语的反应时间以及P3潜伏期和波幅,研究了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)中情绪斯特鲁普干扰效应的来源。患有创伤后应激障碍的个体在指出词语颜色方面较慢,尤其是对于创伤性词语,从而重现了创伤后应激障碍中的情绪斯特鲁普干扰。患有创伤后应激障碍的个体在不同类型词语上的P3成分也显著减少且延迟。在不同诊断组中,与标准中性词语相比,额叶P3波幅对个人积极和创伤性词语更大。然而,P3测量中不存在诊断×词语类型的交互作用,这表明患有创伤后应激障碍的个体与未患创伤后应激障碍的个体在创伤性词语与非创伤性词语颜色的编码和识别上没有差异,并且斯特鲁普干扰在这些早期加工阶段不会发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验