Khanna M M, Badura-Brack A S, McDermott T J, Embury C M, Wiesman A I, Shepherd A, Ryan T J, Heinrichs-Graham E, Wilson T W
Department of Psychology,Creighton University,Omaha, NE,USA.
Center for Magnetoencephalography, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC),Omaha, NE,USA.
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):2017-2027. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000460. Epub 2017 May 8.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is often associated with attention allocation and emotional regulation difficulties, but the brain dynamics underlying these deficits are unknown. The emotional Stroop task (EST) is an ideal means to monitor these difficulties, because participants are asked to attend to non-emotional aspects of the stimuli. In this study, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) and the EST to monitor attention allocation and emotional regulation during the processing of emotionally charged stimuli in combat veterans with and without PTSD.
A total of 31 veterans with PTSD and 20 without PTSD performed the EST during MEG. Three categories of stimuli were used, including combat-related, generally threatening and neutral words. MEG data were imaged in the time-frequency domain and the network dynamics were probed for differences in processing threatening and non-threatening words.
Behaviorally, veterans with PTSD were significantly slower in responding to combat-related relative to neutral and generally threatening words. Veterans without PTSD exhibited no significant differences in responding to the three different word types. Neurophysiologically, we found a significant three-way interaction between group, word type and time period across multiple brain regions. Follow-up testing indicated stronger theta-frequency (4-8 Hz) responses in the right ventral prefrontal (0.4-0.8 s) and superior temporal cortices (0.6-0.8 s) of veterans without PTSD compared with those with PTSD during the processing of combat-related words.
Our data indicated that veterans with PTSD exhibited deficits in attention allocation and emotional regulation when processing trauma cues, while those without PTSD were able to regulate emotion by directing attention away from threat.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)常与注意力分配和情绪调节困难相关,但这些缺陷背后的脑动力学尚不清楚。情绪Stroop任务(EST)是监测这些困难的理想手段,因为要求参与者关注刺激的非情绪方面。在本研究中,我们使用脑磁图(MEG)和EST来监测有和没有PTSD的退伍军人在处理带有情绪的刺激时的注意力分配和情绪调节。
共有31名患有PTSD的退伍军人和20名没有PTSD的退伍军人在MEG期间进行了EST。使用了三类刺激,包括与战斗相关的、一般具有威胁性的和中性的词语。MEG数据在时频域成像,并探究网络动力学在处理威胁性和非威胁性词语时的差异。
在行为上,患有PTSD的退伍军人对与战斗相关的词语的反应明显慢于对中性和一般具有威胁性的词语。没有PTSD的退伍军人对三种不同类型词语的反应没有显著差异。在神经生理学方面,我们在多个脑区发现了组、词语类型和时间段之间的显著三向交互作用。后续测试表明,在处理与战斗相关的词语时,没有PTSD的退伍军人在右侧腹侧前额叶(0.4 - 0.8秒)和颞上叶皮质(0.6 - 0.8秒)的θ频率(4 - 8赫兹)反应比患有PTSD的退伍军人更强。
我们的数据表明,患有PTSD的退伍军人在处理创伤线索时表现出注意力分配和情绪调节缺陷,而没有PTSD的退伍军人能够通过将注意力从威胁上转移来调节情绪。