Suppr超能文献

双水平压力通气机的性能特征:一项肺模型研究。

Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study.

作者信息

Bunburaphong T, Imanaka H, Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek R M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1997 Apr;111(4):1050-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.4.1050.

Abstract

Bilevel pressure ventilators are being used increasingly to provide noninvasive ventilatory support in the management of obstructive sleep apnea, chronic ventilatory failure, and acute respiratory failure. However, the ability of these ventilators to respond to inspiratory demand without imposing expiratory loads has not been evaluated extensively. We evaluated the performance of nine bilevel pressure ventilators in a lung model, as compared with the Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae adult critical care ventilator. All ventilators were set to provide pressure support ventilation (PSV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at a rate of 10 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 1.0 s. Simulated pleural pressure, airway pressure, and flow at airway opening were continuously monitored. We studied the effects of three PSV levels (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O) with 5 cm H2O PEEP at two lung compliances (50 and 80 mL/cm H2O) and four peak inspiratory flow demands (20, 40, 60, and 80 L/min) on seven dependent variables: inspiratory delay time (D-I), inspiratory trigger pressure (P-I), inspiratory area percent (Area I%), expiratory delay time (D-E), supraplateau expiratory pressure change (P-E), expiratory area (Area E), and ventilator peak flow (VPF). Most ventilators performed as well as or significantly (p<0.05) better than the 7200ae in all studied variables. Compliance did not significantly affect ventilator performance. Increasing inspiratory flow demand significantly (p<0.05) increased D-I, P-I, P-E, and VPF and decreased Area I% with most ventilators. As ventilatory demand increased, D-E and Area E significantly (p<0.05) changed. With some units, D-E and Area E increased, while with others they decreased. Most bilevel pressure ventilators evaluated were able to respond to high ventilatory demands and outperformed the Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae ventilator.

摘要

双水平压力通气机越来越多地用于为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、慢性通气衰竭和急性呼吸衰竭的管理提供无创通气支持。然而,这些通气机在不施加呼气负荷的情况下对吸气需求做出反应的能力尚未得到广泛评估。我们在一个肺模型中评估了九台双水平压力通气机的性能,并与Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae成人重症监护通气机进行了比较。所有通气机均设置为以10次/分钟的频率提供压力支持通气(PSV)和呼气末正压(PEEP),吸气时间为1.0秒。持续监测模拟胸膜压力、气道压力和气道开口处的流量。我们研究了在两种肺顺应性(50和80 mL/cm H2O)和四种吸气峰值流量需求(20、40、60和80 L/分钟)下,三种PSV水平(5、10和15 cm H2O)与5 cm H2O PEEP对七个因变量的影响:吸气延迟时间(D-I)、吸气触发压力(P-I)、吸气面积百分比(Area I%)、呼气延迟时间(D-E)、平台期以上呼气压力变化(P-E)、呼气面积(Area E)和通气机峰值流量(VPF)。在所有研究变量中,大多数通气机的表现与7200ae相当或显著(p<0.05)优于7200ae。顺应性对通气机性能没有显著影响。随着吸气流量需求的增加,大多数通气机的D-I、P-I、P-E和VPF显著(p<0.05)增加,而Area I%降低。随着通气需求的增加,D-E和Area E显著(p<0.05)变化。对于一些设备,D-E和Area E增加,而对于其他设备则降低。大多数评估的双水平压力通气机能够应对高通气需求,并且性能优于Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae通气机。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验