• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对南非硬骨鱼(真骨鱼类)过敏的范围。通过双盲、安慰剂对照激发试验进行评估。

The spectrum of allergy to South African bony fish (Teleosti). Evaluation by double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge.

作者信息

Zinn C, Lopata A, Visser M, Potter P C

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1997 Feb;87(2):146-52.

PMID:9107219
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the spectrum of allergy to South African bony fish (Class Teleosti), crustaceans and molluscs and to confirm or refute suspected allergy, specifically to bony fish, by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

DESIGN

Patients were recruited by means of a seafood allergy questionnaire. Subjects with reported allergy to hake, yellowtail, salmon and mackerel were investigated by means of skin-prick tests, RASTs and Western blot analysis. For those subjects with test results that were either all negative or equivocal, a definitive diagnosis of clinical sensitivity was made on the basis of DBPCFC.

SETTING

Volunteer population-based cohort in the Western Cape.

PARTICIPANTS

105 volunteer subjects with suspected fish allergy were recruited by advertising in the local press.

MAIN OUTCOME

Species-specific bony fish allergy was confirmed or refuted by DBPCFC.

RESULTS

The four most common seafood species reported to cause adverse reactions were prawns (46.7%), crayfish (43.8%), abalone (35.2%) and black mussels (33.3%). The four most common bony fish species to cause reactions were hake (24.8%), yellowtail (21.9%), salmon (15.2%) and mackerel (15.2%). Seven DBPCFCs were performed and two open challenges. Skin-prick tests produced one false-negative result. Western blots produced one false-negative and one false-positive result. The RAST had a 100% correlation with DBPCFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Local bony fish represent a significant cause of clinical reactions to seafood in the Western Cape. Although skin-prick tests, RASTs and Western blotting tests assist in the documentation of an IgE responder state, confirmation of clinical sensitivity can only be made with certainty by means of DBPCFC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估对南非硬骨鱼(硬骨鱼纲)、甲壳类动物和软体动物的过敏谱,并通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)来证实或排除疑似过敏,特别是对硬骨鱼的过敏。

设计

通过海鲜过敏问卷招募患者。对报告对无须鳕、黄尾鱼、鲑鱼和鲭鱼过敏的受试者进行皮肤点刺试验、放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)和免疫印迹分析。对于那些试验结果全部为阴性或不明确的受试者,根据DBPCFC做出临床敏感性的明确诊断。

地点

西开普省基于志愿者人群的队列研究。

参与者

通过在当地报纸上刊登广告招募了105名疑似鱼类过敏的志愿者受试者。

主要结果

通过DBPCFC证实或排除了特定种类硬骨鱼过敏。

结果

报告引起不良反应的四种最常见海鲜种类是对虾(46.7%)、小龙虾(43.8%)、鲍鱼(35.2%)和黑贻贝(33.3%)。引起反应的四种最常见硬骨鱼种类是无须鳕(24.8%)、黄尾鱼(21.9%)、鲑鱼(15.2%)和鲭鱼(15.2%)。进行了7次DBPCFC和2次开放性激发试验。皮肤点刺试验产生了1例假阴性结果。免疫印迹产生了1例假阴性和1例假阳性结果。RAST与DBPCFC的相关性为100%。

结论

当地硬骨鱼是西开普省海鲜临床反应的重要原因。虽然皮肤点刺试验、RAST和免疫印迹试验有助于记录IgE反应状态,但只有通过DBPCFC才能确定地证实临床敏感性。

相似文献

1
The spectrum of allergy to South African bony fish (Teleosti). Evaluation by double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge.对南非硬骨鱼(真骨鱼类)过敏的范围。通过双盲、安慰剂对照激发试验进行评估。
S Afr Med J. 1997 Feb;87(2):146-52.
2
Fish allergy: is cross-reactivity among fish species relevant? Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge studies of fish allergic adults.鱼类过敏:鱼类物种之间的交叉反应是否相关?对鱼类过敏成人的双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Dec;83(6 Pt 1):517-23. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62862-1.
3
Hazelnut allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study.榛子过敏:一项双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发多中心研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Mar;105(3):577-81. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.103052.
4
Codfish allergy in adults: IgE cross-reactivity among fish species.成人鳕鱼过敏:鱼类物种间的IgE交叉反应性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Feb;78(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63386-8.
5
Evaluation and standardisation of different matrices used for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges to fish.评估和标准化用于双盲安慰剂对照食物挑战的不同基质用于鱼类。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Oct;23(5):544-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01046.x.
6
Kiwi fruit is a significant allergen and is associated with differing patterns of reactivity in children and adults.猕猴桃是一种重要的过敏原,与儿童和成人不同的反应模式有关。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Jul;34(7):1115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01982.x.
7
Prevalence of immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy in 6-9-year-old urban schoolchildren in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey.土耳其黑海东部地区6至9岁城市学童中免疫球蛋白E介导的食物过敏患病率
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jul;39(7):1027-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03263.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
8
Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年食物特异性IgE浓度与食物激发试验阳性风险之间的关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70133-7.
9
The clinical significance of food specific IgE/IgG4 in food specific atopic dermatitis.食物特异性IgE/IgG4在食物特异性特应性皮炎中的临床意义。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 Feb;18(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00478.x.
10
Celery allergy confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge: a clinical study in 32 subjects with a history of adverse reactions to celery root.通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验确诊芹菜过敏:对32例有芹菜根不良反应史受试者的临床研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Aug;106(2):373-8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.107196.

引用本文的文献

1
Allergens and molecular diagnostics of shellfish allergy: Part 22 of the Series Molecular Allergology.贝类过敏的过敏原与分子诊断:分子变态反应学系列第22部分
Allergo J Int. 2016;25(7):210-218. doi: 10.1007/s40629-016-0124-2. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
2
Fish allergy: in review.鱼类过敏:综述
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Jun;46(3):258-71. doi: 10.1007/s12016-013-8363-1.
3
Food allergies in developing and emerging economies: need for comprehensive data on prevalence rates.发展中和新兴经济体中的食物过敏:需要全面的患病率数据。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2012 Dec 20;2(1):25. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-2-25.
4
Food allergy in Africa: myth or reality?非洲的食物过敏:是神话还是现实?
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Jun;46(3):241-9. doi: 10.1007/s12016-012-8341-z.
5
A contemporary review of seafood allergy.海鲜过敏的当代综述。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2012 Jun;42(3):365-85. doi: 10.1007/s12016-011-8284-9.