• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护领域伦理学的国际视角

International perspectives on ethics in critical care.

作者信息

Nyman D J, Sprung C L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Hadassah University Hospital, Mount Scopus, Israel.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 1997 Apr;13(2):409-15. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70318-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70318-3
PMID:9107516
Abstract

Differences in culture, resources, demand, level of development, and cultural and religious differences may alter ethical approaches around the world. The principles of medical ethics are beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, disclosure of information, and social justice. Difficult decisions as to whom to admit and whom to exclude are faced by physicians internationally. Differences between countries are seen in the withdrawal and withholding of treatments and in the obtaining of informed consent in emergency circumstances.

摘要

文化、资源、需求、发展水平以及文化和宗教差异的不同,可能会改变世界各地的道德观念。医学伦理原则包括行善、不伤害、自主、信息披露和社会公正。国际上的医生都面临着关于收治谁和不收治谁的艰难决策。在治疗的撤销和中止以及紧急情况下获得知情同意方面,各国存在差异。

相似文献

1
International perspectives on ethics in critical care.重症监护领域伦理学的国际视角
Crit Care Clin. 1997 Apr;13(2):409-15. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70318-3.
2
Ethical principles in critical care.重症监护中的伦理原则。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):696-700.
3
Critical care ethics in Hong Kong: cross-cultural conflicts as east meets west.
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):616-27. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.616.2554.
4
Decision-making in intensive care--a reply to Sundström.重症监护中的决策——对桑德斯特伦的回应
Health Care Anal. 1994 Nov;2(4):336-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02251081.
5
Ethics of resuscitation.复苏伦理
Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jan;12(1):135-48. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70220-7.
6
An ethical assessment of intensive care.重症监护的伦理评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Summer;8(3):408-18. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300013714.
7
A transcultural, preventive ethics approach to critical-care medicine: restoring the critical care physician's power and authority.
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):628-42. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.628.2559.
8
Oncology patients in critical care: ethical dilemmas.重症监护中的肿瘤患者:伦理困境
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1991 Mar-Apr;10(2):84-93; discussion 94-5. doi: 10.1097/00003465-199103000-00009.
9
The ethics of resource allocation in critical care.重症监护中的资源分配伦理
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):73-89.
10
Intensive care: who should decide?重症监护:该由谁来做决定?
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):60-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02251339.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting the Mortality Rate in Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Cyprus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.塞浦路斯新冠疫情期间非新冠重症监护病房患者死亡率的影响因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2023 Oct 24;15(10):e47610. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47610. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Providing Neurocritical Care in Resource-Limited Settings: Challenges and Opportunities.在资源有限的环境中提供神经重症护理:挑战与机遇。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Oct;37(2):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01568-2. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
Critical care research and pre-emptive informed consent: a practical approach used in Chris Hani Baragwanath ICU.
重症监护研究与预先知情同意:克里斯·哈尼·巴拉干纳特重症监护病房采用的实用方法。
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Apr;24(4):353-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050579.