Isear J A, Erickson J C, Worrell T W
Krannert School of Physical Therapy, University of Indianapolis, IN 46227, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Apr;29(4):532-9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199704000-00016.
During an unloaded squat, hamstring and quadriceps co-contraction has been documented and explained via a co-contraction hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that the hamstrings provide a stabilizing force at the knee by producing a posteriorly-directed force on the tibia to counteract the anterior tibial force imparted by the quadriceps. Research support for this hypothesis, however, is equivocal. Therefore, the purposes of this study were 1) to determine muscle recruitment patterns of the gluteus maximus, hamstrings, quadriceps, and gastrocnemius during an unloaded squat exercise via EMG and 2) to describe the amount of hamstring-quadriceps co-contraction during an unloaded squat. Surface electrodes were used to monitor the EMG activity of six muscles of 41 healthy subjects during an unloaded squat. Each subject performed three 4-s maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) for each of the six muscles. Electrogoniometers were applied to the knee and hip to monitor joint angles, and each subject performed three series of four complete squats in cadence with a metronome (50 beats.min-1). Each squat consisted of a 1.2-s eccentric, hold, and concentric phase. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (6 muscles x 7 arcs) was used to compare normalized EMG (percent MVIC) values during each arc of motion (0-30 degrees, 30-60 degrees, 60-90 degrees, hold, 90-60 degrees, 60-30 degrees, 30-0 degrees) of the squat. Tukey post-hoc analyses were used to quantify and interpret the significant two-way interactions. Results revealed minimal hamstring activity (4-12% MVIC) as compared with quadriceps activity (VMO: 22-68%, VL: 21-63% of MVIC) during an unloaded squat in healthy subjects. This low level of hamstring EMG activity was interpreted to reflect the low demand placed on the hamstring muscles to counter anterior shear forces acting at the proximal tibia.
在无负荷深蹲过程中,已通过共同收缩假说来记录和解释腘绳肌与股四头肌的共同收缩。该假说认为,腘绳肌通过在胫骨上产生向后的力来抵消股四头肌施加的胫骨向前的力,从而在膝关节处提供稳定力。然而,对这一假说的研究支持并不明确。因此,本研究的目的是:1)通过肌电图确定无负荷深蹲运动过程中臀大肌、腘绳肌、股四头肌和腓肠肌的肌肉募集模式;2)描述无负荷深蹲过程中腘绳肌 - 股四头肌的共同收缩量。使用表面电极监测41名健康受试者在无负荷深蹲过程中六块肌肉的肌电图活动。每位受试者对这六块肌肉中的每一块进行三次4秒的最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)。将角度计应用于膝关节和髋关节以监测关节角度,每位受试者按照节拍器(50次/分钟)的节奏进行三组,每组四次完整的深蹲。每次深蹲包括1.2秒的离心、保持和向心阶段。使用双向重复测量方差分析(6块肌肉×7个弧度)来比较深蹲每个运动弧度(0 - 30度、30 - 60度、60 - 90度、保持、90 - 60度、60 - 30度、30 - 0度)期间的标准化肌电图(MVIC百分比)值。使用Tukey事后分析来量化和解释显著的双向交互作用。结果显示,在健康受试者的无负荷深蹲过程中,与股四头肌活动(股内侧肌:22 - 68% MVIC,股外侧肌:21 - 63% MVIC)相比,腘绳肌活动极低(4 - 12% MVIC)。这种低水平的腘绳肌肌电图活动被解释为反映了腘绳肌对抗作用于胫骨近端的前剪切力的需求较低。