• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同稳定性下单侧深蹲变式的运动学与肌电图比较

Kinematic and EMG Comparison Between Variations of Unilateral Squats Under Different Stabilities.

作者信息

van den Tillaar Roland, Larsen Stian

机构信息

Department of Sports Sciences and Physcial Education, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.

出版信息

Sports Med Int Open. 2020 Jul 16;4(2):E59-E66. doi: 10.1055/a-1195-1039. eCollection 2020 Aug.

DOI:10.1055/a-1195-1039
PMID:32685673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365712/
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare kinematics and muscle activity between two variations of unilateral squats under different stability conditions. Twelve male volunteers (age: 23±5 years, mass: 80±17 kg, height: 1.81±0.11 m, strength-training experience: 4.3±1.9 years) performed four repetitions with the same external load (≈4RM). Two variations (with the non-stance leg forwards vs. backwards) were performed in a Smith-machine and free-weight condition. The variables were barbell velocity, lifting time and surface electromyography activity of the lower extremity and trunk muscles during the descending and ascending phase. The main findings were 1) peak force was higher when performing the unilateral squats in the Smith machine; 2) peak ascending barbell velocity increased from repetition 3-4 with free weight; and 3) muscle activity from the rectus femoris, vastus lateral, biceps femoris, gluteus medius, and erector spinae increased with repetitions, whereas gluteus, and medial vastus and shank muscles were affected by the conditions. It was concluded that more peak force could be produced because of increased stability. However, peak barbell velocity increased from repetition to repetition in free-weight unilateral squats, which was probably because the participants grew more comfortable. Furthermore, increased instability causes more gluteus and vastus medial activation and foot variations mainly affected the calf muscles.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在不同稳定性条件下单侧深蹲的两种变式之间的运动学和肌肉活动情况。12名男性志愿者(年龄:23±5岁,体重:80±17千克,身高:1.81±0.11米,力量训练经验:4.3±1.9年)以相同的外部负荷(约4RM)进行了4次重复动作。在史密斯机和自由重量条件下进行了两种变式(非支撑腿向前与向后)。变量包括杠铃速度、举起时间以及下肢和躯干肌肉在下降和上升阶段的表面肌电图活动。主要研究结果为:1)在史密斯机上进行单侧深蹲时峰值力更高;2)自由重量条件下,从第3次到第4次重复,杠铃上升峰值速度增加;3)股直肌、股外侧肌、股二头肌、臀中肌和竖脊肌的肌肉活动随重复次数增加,而臀肌、股内侧肌和小腿肌肉受条件影响。研究得出结论,由于稳定性增加,可产生更大的峰值力。然而,自由重量单侧深蹲中杠铃峰值速度逐次增加,这可能是因为参与者越来越适应。此外,不稳定性增加会导致更多臀肌和股内侧肌激活,足部变化主要影响小腿肌肉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/345f7c5f4474/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/818145461e7b/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/0d6be472aad3/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/345f7c5f4474/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/818145461e7b/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/0d6be472aad3/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7365712/345f7c5f4474/10-1055-a-1195-1039-i04-2020-0150-0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinematic and EMG Comparison Between Variations of Unilateral Squats Under Different Stabilities.不同稳定性下单侧深蹲变式的运动学与肌电图比较
Sports Med Int Open. 2020 Jul 16;4(2):E59-E66. doi: 10.1055/a-1195-1039. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
COMPARISON OF BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL SQUAT EXERCISES ON BARBELL KINEMATICS AND MUSCLE ACTIVATION.双侧与单侧深蹲练习对杠铃运动学和肌肉激活的比较
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;13(5):871-881.
3
Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.不同负荷下自由重量深蹲时肌肉激活和运动学的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0217044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217044. eCollection 2019.
4
The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats.杠铃放置位置对深蹲中卡滞区域周围运动学和肌肉激活的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Nov 11;2:604177. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.604177. eCollection 2020.
5
An Examination of Muscle Activation and Power Characteristics While Performing the Deadlift Exercise With Straight and Hexagonal Barbells.使用直杆杠铃和六角杠铃进行硬拉练习时的肌肉激活和力量特征研究。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1183-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001352.
6
A comparison of free weight squat to Smith machine squat using electromyography.自由重量深蹲与史密斯机深蹲的肌电图比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2588-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b181.
7
Electromyographic activity in the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and rectus femoris during the Monopodal Squat, Forward Lunge and Lateral Step-Up exercises.单腿深蹲、前弓步和侧弓步练习时臀中肌、臀大肌、股二头肌、股外侧肌、股内侧肌和股直肌的肌电图活动。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230841. eCollection 2020.
8
Core Muscle Activation in Three Lower Extremity Exercises With Different Stability Requirements.三种下肢练习的核心肌肉激活,要求稳定性不同。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):304-309. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003465.
9
Is the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Smith Machine Squats the Result of Diminishing Potentiation and Co-Contraction of the Prime Movers among Recreationally Resistance Trained Males?最大史密斯机深蹲中黏着区的出现是否是娱乐性抗阻训练男性主动肌的渐弱和协同收缩减少的结果?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031366.
10
Muscle Activation in Unilateral Barbell Exercises: Implications for Strength Training and Rehabilitation.单侧杠铃练习中的肌肉激活:对力量训练和康复的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S85-S94. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002617.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Olympic and Safety Squat Bar Barbells on Force, Velocity, and Rating of Perceived Exertion During Acute High-Intensity Back Squats in Recreationally Trained Men.奥林匹克杠铃与安全深蹲杆在休闲训练男性急性高强度后深蹲过程中的力量、速度及主观用力程度比较
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;17(7):1120-1133. doi: 10.70252/QTXB6775. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance - a systematic review and meta-analysis.自由重量训练与器械力量训练对最大力量、肌肉肥大和跳跃性能的影响——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug 15;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2020 Update.体育与运动科学研究中的伦理标准:2020年更新
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(13):813-817. doi: 10.1055/a-1015-3123. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
2
Comparison of Myoelectric Activity During a Suspension-Based and Traditional Split Squat.悬吊式与传统分腿蹲时肌电活动的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Dec;33(12):3236-3241. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003338.
3
Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.不同负荷下自由重量深蹲时肌肉激活和运动学的比较。
A novel balance training approach: Biomechanical study of virtual reality-based skateboarding.
一种新型平衡训练方法:基于虚拟现实的滑板运动生物力学研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 10;11:1136368. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136368. eCollection 2023.
4
Differences in lower limb muscle activation between global and selective instability devices in single-leg stance in healthy active subjects.健康活跃受试者单腿站立时,整体式和选择性不稳定装置对下肢肌肉激活的差异。
PeerJ. 2022 Apr 18;10:e13317. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13317. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Stance Width and Barbell Placement on Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity in Back Squats.深蹲时站立宽度和杠铃位置对运动学、动力学和肌电活动的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Sep 1;3:719013. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.719013. eCollection 2021.
6
New Insights About the Sticking Region in Back Squats: An Analysis of Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity.深蹲动作中停滞阶段的新见解:运动学、动力学及肌电活动分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jun 8;3:691459. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.691459. eCollection 2021.
7
Is the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Smith Machine Squats the Result of Diminishing Potentiation and Co-Contraction of the Prime Movers among Recreationally Resistance Trained Males?最大史密斯机深蹲中黏着区的出现是否是娱乐性抗阻训练男性主动肌的渐弱和协同收缩减少的结果?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031366.
8
Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review.在抗阻训练干预期间,主观和客观的强度及训练量自动调节方法对增强最大力量的影响:一项系统评价
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 12;9:e10663. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10663. eCollection 2021.
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0217044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217044. eCollection 2019.
4
Effect of Descent Velocity upon Muscle Activation and Performance in Two-Legged Free Weight Back Squats.下降速度对双腿自由重量深蹲中肌肉激活及表现的影响。
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jan 7;7(1):15. doi: 10.3390/sports7010015.
5
COMPARISON OF BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL SQUAT EXERCISES ON BARBELL KINEMATICS AND MUSCLE ACTIVATION.双侧与单侧深蹲练习对杠铃运动学和肌肉激活的比较
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;13(5):871-881.
6
NOT ALL SINGLE LEG SQUATS ARE EQUAL: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THREE VARIATIONS.并非所有单腿深蹲都是一样的:三种变式的生物力学比较。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;11(2):201-11.
7
Comparison of Kinematics and Muscle Activation in Free-Weight Back Squat With and Without Elastic Bands.自由重量深蹲时使用和不使用弹力带的运动学和肌肉激活情况比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):945-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001178.
8
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Squat Training for Strength, Sprints, and Agility in Academy Rugby Players.单侧与双侧深蹲训练对学院派橄榄球运动员力量、短跑和敏捷性的影响
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Feb;30(2):386-92. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001096.
9
The existence of a sticking region in free weight squats.自由重量深蹲中存在一个停滞区域。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Oct 10;42:63-71. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0061. eCollection 2014 Sep 29.
10
Effect of Fatigue Upon Performance and Electromyographic Activity in 6-RM Bench Press.6 次重复最大负荷卧推中疲劳对运动表现和肌电图活动的影响。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 9;40:57-65. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0007. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.