Argenziano M, Oz M C, Rose E A
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons New York, New York, USA.
Curr Probl Surg. 1997 Apr;34(4):317-86. doi: 10.1016/s0011-3840(97)80014-7.
A great number of patients suffer and die of the sequelae of acute and chronic heart failure each year. Although advances in medical and surgical therapy have benefited many of these patients, most have disease that is refractory to any definitive therapy. For these patients cardiac transplantation is the only remaining hope. Unfortunately, because of the increasing demand for donor organs in the face of a fixed and limited supply, this option is available to only a small percentage of these patients. Even in patients accepted for transplantation, a significant waiting list mortality has been observed. A variety of VADs have been developed since the first successful case of mechanical cardiac assistance more than 30 years ago. These devices differ in basic mechanical function, method of insertion, and degree of implantability and thus have different indications and potential applications. Whereas the intraaortic balloon pump and centrifugal pumps are effective short-term support modalities, extracorporeal and implantable pulsatile devices have been used successfully for long-term support of patients with reversible and nonreversible cardiac failure. Although these pumps have most commonly been used as bridges to transplantation, increasing clinical experience has supported the notion of long-term mechanical assistance as a definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart disease. Although complications, particularly infection and thromboembolism, pose significant challenges and long-term device reliability remains to be fully determined, available implantable devices appear to be capable of providing effective long-term support. As data are obtained from currently ongoing trials comparing VAD support with medical therapy for end-stage heart failure, ethical and economic issues will assume increasing importance.
每年都有大量患者因急慢性心力衰竭的后遗症而受苦甚至死亡。尽管医学和外科治疗的进展使许多此类患者受益,但大多数患者的疾病对任何确定性治疗都难以奏效。对于这些患者而言,心脏移植是仅存的希望。不幸的是,由于供体器官的需求不断增加而供应却固定且有限,只有一小部分患者能够获得这种选择。即使在被接受移植的患者中,也观察到了显著的等待名单死亡率。自30多年前首例机械心脏辅助成功病例以来,已开发出多种心室辅助装置(VAD)。这些装置在基本机械功能、植入方法和可植入程度方面存在差异,因此具有不同的适应症和潜在应用。主动脉内球囊泵和离心泵是有效的短期支持方式,而体外和可植入的搏动性装置已成功用于可逆性和不可逆性心力衰竭患者的长期支持。尽管这些泵最常用于作为移植的桥梁,但越来越多的临床经验支持将长期机械辅助作为终末期心脏病患者的确定性治疗方法这一观点。尽管并发症,尤其是感染和血栓栓塞,构成了重大挑战,且长期装置可靠性仍有待全面确定,但现有的可植入装置似乎能够提供有效的长期支持。随着从目前正在进行的比较VAD支持与终末期心力衰竭药物治疗的试验中获得数据,伦理和经济问题将变得越来越重要。